Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Ships and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76Auto-archiving period: 21 days  |
 | Ships Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | WikiProject Ships was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 28 June 2010. |
 _at_anchor_off_Bahrain_on_1_December_1986_(6475450).jpg) |
|---|
| Things you can do |
|
| Information and sources |
|
I would like to add a disambiguation parenthetical for Outrigger to distinguish from the video game. Taking a look at Category:Watercraft components, Category:Sailboat components, Category:Shipbuilding, and Category:Naval architecture, it seems there are a number of options to choose from: (ship), (watercraft), (nautical), (naval architecture), (marine), (boating), (boat building), (ship building), (ship part), (ship construction), and potentially more that I missed.
In spirit of WP:BOLD I went ahead with (nautical), but I am leaving this comment here to document potential disambiguation... ambiguity? Tule-hog (talk) 21:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Ship template for Scharnhorst
editIs there any way that {{ship}} can be got to work for German battleship Scharnhorst? ThoughtIdRetired TIR 09:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Does this not work for you?
{{ship|German battleship|Scharnhorst}}→ German battleship Scharnhorst
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 11:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- I was looking for something equivalent to Agamemnon i.e. chop out the shortest version of the name without all the extra stuff in the article title. The fact that doesn't work (for me, at least) appears to be a function of the way the article is named. I'm just checking that I'm not missing something really obvious. ThoughtIdRetired TIR 12:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wiil the following do what you want?
{{ship|German battleship|Scharnhorst||2}}→ Scharnhorst
- — Murgatroyd49 (talk) 12:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)—
- I could have sworn I'd already tried that, but clearly I hadn't. Thanks, ThoughtIdRetired TIR 15:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Navy ship Palestine
editHello everybody. At one time, Palestinian security forces used the former fishing trawler Chandalahe for military purposes; Israel damaged it in 2002 and since then it has been abandoned off the coast of Gaza. I wanted to know what his current fate is? Vyacheslav84 (talk) 23:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Vyacheslav84 Does it even have a Wikipedia page? Alexysun (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Is Type 001, Type 002, Type 003, and so on in terms of the Chinese aircraft carriers really it's own class?
editIs Type 001, Type 002, Type 003 in terms of the Chinese aircraft carriers really a "class" of ships if they only have one ship per Type 001, Type 002, Type 003, and so on? Seems to me that it seems to be just a name for the ship before they choose an official name, because it's only one ship. There are not two Type 001s etc. Does my question make sense. Alexysun (talk) 23:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes your question does make sense. I would suggest the usual way of doing things; that is for single ship classes to have just one page like Japanese aircraft carrier Sōryū. That being said, Type 003 is not finished yet and could have multiple ships to that design. However for Type 001 and Type 002, the question is pertinent. Llammakey (talk) 11:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Okay got it, so it's good as it is right now. Alexysun (talk) 18:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)