Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Theatre
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Theatre and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 60 days  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Theatre articles by quality and importance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Importance | ||||||
| Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
 FA
|
2 | 13 | 11 | 35 | 61 | ||
| FL
|
1 | 4 | 35 | 40 | |||
| FM
|
222 | 222 | |||||
 GA
|
3 | 9 | 19 | 123 | 6 | 160 | |
| B | 17 | 67 | 154 | 510 | 49 | 797 | |
| C | 37 | 119 | 426 | 2,483 | 153 | 3,218 | |
| Start | 20 | 110 | 796 | 9,137 | 383 | 10,446 | |
| Stub | 3 | 29 | 254 | 6,487 | 215 | 6,988 | |
| List | 1 | 6 | 230 | 324 | 16 | 577 | |
| Category | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6,907 | 6,913 | ||
| Disambig | 58 | 58 | |||||
| File | 601 | 601 | |||||
| Portal | 5 | 5 | |||||
| Project | 31 | 31 | |||||
| Redirect | 1 | 1 | 19 | 153 | 1,515 | 1,689 | |
| Template | 583 | 583 | |||||
| NA | 6 | 5 | 11 | ||||
| Other | 201 | 201 | |||||
| Assessed | 84 | 356 | 1,914 | 19,297 | 10,128 | 822 | 32,601 |
| Unassessed | 1 | 41 | 564 | 606 | |||
| Total | 84 | 356 | 1,915 | 19,338 | 10,128 | 1,386 | 33,207 |
| WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 109,757 | Ω = 5.06 | |||||
Soliciting your input in the AFC process
editHello WikiProject Theatre. If you'd be so kind, I'd like to solicit your input in the following discussion: Draft talk:History of theaters in Chehalis, Washington#Submitting draft for review! Melmann 21:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:RADA#Requested move 20 July 2024
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:RADA#Requested move 20 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 18:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
"Royal Circle" Why is this 46.193.114.106 (talk) 15:20, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Rimini Protokoll
editI am trying to improve and expand the article on Rimini Protokoll. To my surprise, actually, this seems to be a very contentious issue. As usual I took care to source my amendments and to write as objectively as possible. Still, I meet a lot of resistance. Until now, I have not really understood the problem. Could anyone of you please have a look and perhaps give and informed 3rd opinion [on the article talk page]. Thank you so much! By the way the initial question group vs lable vs collective is nothing I would not negotiate about, but in the meantime a lot of other substantial contributions to the article were just deleted with [little] or [no] explicit justification (by the way [|not I] had been blocked but [the other user] for vandalizing my text, so that was no reason for reverting to his version, on the contrary). I guess it could help to have another perspective on the conflict and be it to understand better the other side...--Olag (talk) 07:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Kevin Spacey § Kevin Spacey sexual misconduct allegations spun off into another article without consensus
edit
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Kevin Spacey § Kevin Spacey sexual misconduct allegations spun off into another article without consensus, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Spinixster (trout me!) 00:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Bristol Old Vic
editBristol Old Vic has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)