Wikipedia talk:Article Creation and Improvement Drive/votes

Vote #	Subject	Proposer	Date	For/against	Status
1	Lifting the threshold to 4 votes per week	Dijxtra	February 26, 2006	13/6	Passed
2	Having two AID articles per week	Litefantastic	February 27, 2006	6/4	Passed; Annulled by Vote #4
3	Nomination Moratorium [for articles]	Juppiter	March 3, 2006	1/1	Since both Votes 1 and 2 passed; Vote 3, which was intended as an alternative, was abandoned
4	Return to one AID article per week	Juppiter	March 21, 2006	8/0	Passed, annulling Vote #2
5	Reelection [of incumbent AID articles]	Litefantastic	April 5, 2006	2/1	Stopped (No result) Scheduled for re-voting.
6	Removing votecount from headings	Dijxtra	April 16, 2006	0/5	Failed
7	Removal of voters with only votes as contributions	Steven	21:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC)	6/3	Passed
8	Should people not be allowed to advertise for an AID nominee	Steven	22:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC)	Vote has been lost	No Consensus
9	Should the AID template go on the article's talk page	Josen	June 12 2006 (UTC)	Vote has been lost	No Consensus
10	Renaming the collaboration to "Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive"	Diez2 and Pious7	17:18, 24 April 2007 {UTC}	4-0 change name

Vote #10: Renaming of the project

Moved from Wikipedia talk:Article Creation and Improvement Drive
This poll is now closed. Result: 4-0 change name
Would anyone support the renaming of this collaboration to be "Article Improvement Drive"? In at least the past 2 years, we never have used this collaboration to actually create an article. Sooooo, why is it named so? Any comments or "votes" are welcome. Diez2 16:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

• How about "Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive" so the acronym "ACID" and shortcut stay? — Pious7_Talk^Contribs 19:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

• I would agree to Pious7's idea, it's a lot better to keep the current acronym. Is there any formal way to vote for a name change? --RazorICE 01:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Yes, finally! I'd been thinking of suggesting this for ages. The current name is inaccurate, and leads to the current ridiculous acronym instead of the perfectly suited AID. It's almost like the perfect name was leaping off the page but someone chose not to use it anyway. I'd vote for changing the name to "Article Improvement Drive" which would be more accurate, and the acronym "AID". --Daniel11 04:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Agree to Pious7's solution. bibliomaniac15 04:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Agree to Pious7's solution. You're right, the current acronym should stay. Diez2 17:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)