Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2013/April

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting‎ | Proposals‎ | Archive‎ | 2013
(Redirected from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2013/April)

Proposals, April 2013

Asian railstations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose allowing rail station templates for all Asian countries with a population greater than 20 million:

Also upmerge all of these templates to Category:Asian railway station stubs. Dawynn (talk) 13:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Support. Anyone with access to a national railway timetable for the countries in question ought to be able to create several stub articles fairly quickly. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Women's footballer templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose to create the following templates:

While the Spanish template will be used on more than 100 articles, the other templates have a potential of around 30 to 60 articles per template. As women's footballer stub templates for other countries, these can be speedy created. Mentoz86 (talk) 21:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Italian painter stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Urge speedy creation. There are already Italy-painter-14thC, 15thC, 16thC, 17thC, By the way, add in a 20thC-stub --Rococo1700 (talk) 21:22, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

It seems you copy-pasted a category page into {{Italy-painter-19thC-stub}}, but I fixed it into an upmerged template. I'm wondering though if upmerged templates like that needs another category than Category:Italian painter stubs. I see the 19th century stub-template now is used on 17 articles, I don't see the point of having templates for every century BC, so you should find a reasonable number of stubs for each template, even if there are upmerged. Mentoz86 (talk) 01:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Universalism stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Unnecessary; only 4 articles currently using this template. Don't create..
Request, to pick up {{Universalism-stub}}. (32 P) --Devin Murphy (talk) 20:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Oppose - only 31 transclusions, not the stub category for a WikiProject. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose - It could, potentially, be a stub category for the Unitarian Universalism work group, but there is already a stub category for Category:Unitarian Universalism stubs which has only 34 articles. I don't know how many additional articles might be creatable based on the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion/Unitarian Universalism work group/Encyclopedic articles, because it doesn't differentiate between Unitarian, Universalism, and Unitarian Universalism, but I think it might make more sense to create some of the missing articles relevant to universalism first. John Carter (talk) 22:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
  • There has been a wrench thrown into this proposal by User:Fadesga. Fadesga has removed {{Universalism-stub}} from the Universalist related biography subs that I had put it on and created {{Universalism-bio-stub}} and put it on the Universalist related biography subs instead. Their rationale for this change is this; "the Category:Religion stubs is overpopulated, while the Category:Religious biography stubs is underpopulated". Now {{Universalism-stub}} is only used on 4 stubs. I wonder how this will impact this proposal? --Devin Murphy (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
  • A different proposal. I have been looking at these stub templates, that seem to be related to each other:
  • {{UnitarianUniversalism-stub}} with 36 stubs (and they have their own, too small, stub category),
  • {{Unitarianism-stub}} with 25 stubs (and they also have their own, too small, stub category)
  • {{Universalism-stub}} + the directly related {{Universalism-bio-stub}}, together there are 32 stubs (and Devin Murphy is proposing a category).
My proposal is somehow different. Given the fact that there are already two underpopulated categories, I am thinking about some kind of redistribution. (Further looking at other related categories, I see that there is an existing {{Unitarian, Universalist and Unitarian Universalist topics}}). Instead of having each template a separate category, there could be an "umbrella" stub category taking up all of them; or an alternative, using transcluded templates:
My 2 cents... --Fadesga (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Category:Universalism stubs would be under my proposal a subcategory of Category:Universalism. I am proposing that all articles marked {{Universalism-stub}} and {{Universalism-bio-stub}} be put into this new category. I am making this proposal as a way to list all the Universalisim stub artistic separately from the Unitarian Universalism ones in the same manner as is done with the Unitarianism subs using Category:Unitarianism stubs. I feel this is a good thing to do as it helps folks who would like to work on only one of these arias and not all three of them to have an easy way to do this. I am open though to alliterative ways to achieve this. --Devin Murphy (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Chaouia-Ouardigha geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. To pick up {{ChaouiaOuardigha-geo-stub}}. (84 P) Dawynn (talk) 18:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Meknès-Tafilalet geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal, to pick up {{MeknèsTafilalet-geo-stub}}. 78 pages. Dawynn (talk) 18:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Chinese sports team stubs / {{PRChina-sport-team-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request. Three existing templates can already fill this category:

Requesting the generic template because I already see a few other teams in the main China sport stub category (for handball and other sports). Dawynn (talk) 15:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:South African Olympic medalist stubs‎

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request, picking up {{SouthAfrica-Olympic-medalist-stub}}. 60 articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Support. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:52, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Exploratory template: {{Kenya-Olympic-medalist-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Kenya makes up a good number of the articles currently tagged with {{Africa-Olympic-medalist-stub}}. Propose migrating these to a country-specific template. Dawynn (talk) 13:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Vetigastropoda stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I see that Category:Vetigastropoda splits by superfamily instead of family. Propose that we make a few judicious splits along that line to help break up this category:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

South American Transport stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose new transport templates, and categories where feasible for all of the larger South American countries. (Argentina and Brazil already have categories, but Brazil is missing a template)

Dawynn (talk) 12:08, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Vetigastropoda stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently sorting the Vetigastropoda. Looking for approval for a few categories and potential categories based on current template counts. For each of these, I will wait until a full 60+ articles tagged:

Dawynn (talk) 13:12, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Lycaenidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose two new subfamily splits for Lycaenidae:

Dawynn (talk) 12:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2013/April&oldid=1138356733"