Wikipedia:Peer review/Juno (film)/archive1

Juno (film)

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it has the potential to be a FA, but I think we could use some advice on clearing up defects in the article before proceeding with FAC.

• A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for September 2008.

Thanks, Wehwalt (talk) 23:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments from [[SriMesh | talk 01:43, 21 September 2008 (UTC)]]

• Is the monetary amount $ American / $ Canadian dollar currency? $6.5 million - $60,016 - and etc...every time currency is mentioned

• The infobox image is [[Wikipedia:Non-free content}Non-free content]] add the template described on Non-free use rationale guideline on the actual image description page for your article. Do this for every non free image being used in articles. This image has an example...Image:Bhagavad-Gitas.JPG Better yet use public domain images. Put in a request.

• This entire section has no citations or references at all. Every fact needs a reference. Each paragraph should have 2 - 3 references minimum.

• The film appeared on many critics' top ten lists of the best films of 2007:

• Antifeminist --> Anti feminist screenwriting-->screen writing

• Antifeminism and screenwriting are both single words. —97198 (talk) 03:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

• Wikifiy the word blog

• CDs should be spelled out the first time as compact discs and wikified abbreviation added in parenthesis if CD used again in article. And are they sound CDs or DVD CDs?

• catalog is american spelling catalogue is british be consistent throughout article

• Is cartoonized a word?

Thanks for the comments, I'll implement when I'm less tired. More comments, anyone?--Wehwalt (talk) 02:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

• Comments
  • you've got a good Fair Use rationale for Image:Junoposter2007.jpg and all the other images are free use, but per WP:NFCC the fair use rationale must be explicitly stated for each article. Thus, swap the current template with {{Non-free use rationale}}. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 15:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
  • POV: remove or incorporate the top ten lists section, beef up reception. If you're not going to have any information about the cast besides the listing, why have it (it's in the infobox...) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 13:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)

• You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC.
  • What makes the following reliable sources?
    • http://www.comingsoon.net/
    • http://www.movieweb.com/
    • http://www.flipsidemovies.com/
    • http://baltimore.metromix.com/music/article/big-screen-chemistry/287031/content
    • http://www.product-reviews.net/2007/09/12/juno-soundtrack-best-soundtrack-of-the-year/
    • http://www.ioncinema.com/
    • http://www.slashfilm.com/
  • Per the MOS, link titles shouldn't be in all capitals.
    • http://mmbase.submarinechannel.com/titlesequences/index.jsp
    • http://www.socialmediaready.com/2008/01/27/great-movie-marketing-and-a-hamburger-phone-from-juno/
  • Current ref 81 is lacking a last access date.
  • Current ref 82 is a dead link? Need to fix if so.

Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 13:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)