Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 28

< March 27	March 29 >

March 28 edit

Template:China Squad 2005 FIFA World Youth Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:China Squad 2005 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The general consensus at WP:FOOTY is that navboxes for youth tournaments are not appropriate. – Pee Jay 14:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 14:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and consensus. Jogurney (talk) 21:35, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Adult industry edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 17:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adult industry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created by a blocked self-promotional user. See this article on YNOT that he wrote about using wikipedia for their own purposes.

Template:Pittsburgh Steelers/meta/color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete - Nabla (talk) 00:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pittsburgh Steelers/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has no value and serves no purpose that I can discern. It is not used by any other pages. Deejayk (talk) 04:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I think this was originally supposed to be part of a standardization project for NFL team colors, but it's been so long that I don't even recall. PSUMark2006 (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete also per nom. black ngold29 20:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Settlement 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete - Nabla (talk) 00:48, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Settlement 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. This is a fork of {{Infobox Settlement}}. If an improvement is needed to a template like {{Infobox Settlement}}, then it should be discussed on its talk page and shouldn't have an identical fork created with an added feature. It goes against the idea of having a standard infobox. —MJCdetroit ^(yak) 03:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The purpose of having general infoboxes like {{Infobox Settlement}} is standardization; creating forks to add or remove individual features undermines that purpose. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 21:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.