Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 25

< March 24	March 26 >

March 25 edit

Template:Tarek Khalil Atallah edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G6. Per Black Falcon's rationale: It's the same thing, just in the wrong namespace, so removing it is just cleanup. So Why 08:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tarek Khalil Atallah (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template used only to promote creator. Related article Tarek Khalil Atallah is nominated for deletion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarek Khalil Atallah). Beagel (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a duplicate article in the wrong namespace. Perhaps this could be speedy deleted under criterion G6 (non-controversial maintenance). I've tagged tagged it for review by a 2nd admin. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dexter's Lab edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 06:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dexter's Lab (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template made for the intended purpose of navigating two articles with little latitude for expansion, possibly by a sockpuppet of a banned user. treelo _radda 00:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – insufficient material to warrant a navbox. It seems that there are just four articles about the topic—the main article, the lists of characters and episodes, and Dexter's Laboratory: Ego Trip—and they are all adequately interlinked via in-text links. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Useless template. Also, the three last links are to unrelated articles. ☺ Spiby ☻ 15:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnecessary template. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 16:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Useless template, nowhere near enough valid links. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not necessary, not enough links to warrant having a separate template. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 22:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.