Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 17

< March 16	March 18 >

March 17 edit

Template:Company of Thieves edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 03:57, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Company of Thieves (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

One extra link besides the main article doesn't require a template. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete template does not make navigation easier as links are readily available in the text. Odie5533 (talk) 02:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kim Il-sung University edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --Magioladitis (talk) 18:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kim Il-sung University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All redlinks, likely to remain that way. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.^TheJay ^Experience 11:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC
Delete Template is incomplete and does not help navigation as all links are red. Odie5533 (talk) 02:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Darkstalkers characters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 03:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Darkstalkers characters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is unneeded at this point, only covering two character articles and the character list. Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unless this article, List of characters in the Darkstalkers series, is split into multiple, smaller, articles. Then the template might be necessary. - Fastily (talk) 04:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. List of characters in the Darkstalkers series already fulfills the same navigational purpose (or even better since you don't have to scroll down). – sgeureka ^t•c 15:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Allplot edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. JPG-GR (talk) 03:59, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Allplot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is unused and is redundant to {{plot}}. --Blooper (Talk) 01:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Template is used in multiple articles and is different from {{plot}} as it notes articles or sections being all plot, whereas {{plot}} refers to a plot section being too long or detailed in comparison to the rest of the article. - Fastily (talk) 04:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm? It isn't used on any articles at all. Check its what links here page again. --Blooper (Talk) 01:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Although the template is not currently in use, I have come across many articles about fictional works that would need exactly this template. I think adding it to one of the template lists would be useful and increase its usage. Odie5533 (talk) 02:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw - As it seems this template can be useful, I would like to withdraw this nomination. I will make an effort to link to this template in the template list and "See also" sections of other templates, along with adding proper documentation. --Blooper (Talk) 20:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am still not convinced that "plot" doesn't cover it. 100% plot vs 0% no plot still means that the plot part is bigger than the non plot one. We can rephrase "plot" if this is the problem. "Allplot" makes things more difficult to handle. Take the only article having this template for example. In Notorious 2009 (film) the plot section of an article is correctly tagged "allplot" but this means that the plot part is larger than the rest of the article. We won't meet any "allplot" situation for a whole article. I would say delete, since "plot" is more flexible. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.