Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 June 7

< June 6	June 8 >

June 7 edit

Template:Jctint/noaccess edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jctint/noaccess (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The "noaccess" type has been deprecated for some time based on long-standing consensus at WP:USRD. All instances were recently phased out and this template is no longer necessary. – T M F 22:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jctint/deleted edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jctint/deleted (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The "deleted" type has been deprecated for some time based on long-standing consensus at WP:USRD. All instances were recently phased out and this template is no longer necessary. – T M F 22:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-3.0 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-3.0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

On June 15, 2009, this template will be obsolete as Wikipedia's licensing terms for all past and most future contributions will be changed to that specified by this template. Anomie ⚔ 17:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If this is closed as Delete before June 15, please wait until June 15 to perform the actual deletion. Anomie ⚔ 17:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on June 15. It will no longer be needed (and will potentially be confusing) once Wikipedia's general license changes. Actually, this is probably a G6 (uncontroversial maintenance) candidate as long as it waits for the license change, though I agree with the idea of bringing it here. — Gavia immer (talk) 23:37, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As of now the template is still in use and valid. Before the official transition has taken place, the template should still be kept. I suggest to delete once the license is updated in Wikipedia. --98.154.26.247 (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The official transition is in two days, which is just after the scheduled end of this TFD. Anomie ⚔ 01:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All right, you win over my words, I didn't figure that out before. But I went to meta-wiki and the implementation is still in draft stage. I guess it's not fully completed yet. (Still gonna miss the original GFDL-only license here!) --98.154.26.247 (talk) 07:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm just wondering, I saw some of the templates are marked "deprecated" but are not deleted. Do those templates have difference with this one? --98.154.26.247 (talk) 07:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reply to above: deprecated+orphan = delete. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete don't we accept this when we click in "edit" button. MediaWiki:Copyrightwarning. Locos ~ epraix Beaste~praix 17:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Toonami edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Toonami (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Curious beast of a template acting to cover every show ever aired within a programming slot but used by no articles. If there were a speedy deletion criteria regarding unused templates I'd have used that but seeing as we don't... treelo _radda 15:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Treelo, unused. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DraXsiS edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DraXsiS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There are no articles in the template. Only one page includes the template. -- Darth Mike ^(talk) 05:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Navboxes are intended to facilitate navigation between articles, not to format information within articles. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 16:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.