Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 June 11

< June 10	June 12 >

June 11 edit

Template:MLBPostseason edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 16:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MLBPostseason (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a template that was created without discussion or consensus. The current format that is approved by WP:BASEBALL uses tables, and the template makes it extremely difficult for even experienced users to edit or update postseason game results. Additionally, the template was being used as a substitute for Template:Linescore, which, while complicated, is a much more appropriate way to display a baseball box score. The uses of the template were minimal, having only been applied to the 2008 postseason articles and, for some reason, the 2009 All-Star game, which hasn't even occurred yet. I reverted the template back to the approved table version, so it's no longer being used. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 17:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I created this template to replace the table of the matchups under the Matchups sections, not the linescores. I only put the template in articles relating to the 2008 Postseason, but I still left the linescores. Also, I included a sample model of what to enter. Team 1 is the road team and Team 2 is the home team.

However, you can delete the template Template:DivisionSeries (which I also created) since I can use this template for Division Series games.

68.96.162.195 (talk) 23:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Natedawg519[reply]

Clarification: The template was being used redundantly to the Linescore template when used in articles about one game only. In an article about a series, we use tables which use a much easier syntax. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 23:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All the articles about Hockey and Basketball use templates like these. This is a derivative of the template Template:Basketballbox. On articles about the NBA Playoffs, they use that template instead of tables. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.162.195 (talk) 23:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Please see Wikipedia:Other stuff exists --Muboshgu (talk) 17:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Muboshgu (talk) 17:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:POTD/2009-06-14 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted G2 by User:Howcheng. JPG-GR (talk) 22:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:POTD/2009-06-14 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I declined to delete this speedily as nonsense as there may be some hope for it, but I can't imagine what it's for. Need community input on deleting this. Thanks Dloh cierekim 15:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Dloh cierekim 15:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Delete. 134.187.128.99 (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the power invested in me as unofficial POTD director, this has been speedily deleted. For future notice, any POTD that does not show a featured picture may be speedily deleted without any further comment. howcheng {chat} 17:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:THES-QS Pan-Chinese edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Since Template:THES - QS World University Ranking - Taiwan was not tagged for deletion at any time during this deletion discussion, please initiate a separate nomination for that template. –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 19:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:THES-QS Pan-Chinese (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This article's existence is a POV push attempt to further the KMT-CPC claim that Taiwan is part of "China". This is not a neutral POV. The source that lists the universities does not group them the way this article does. Talk page attempts to make the scope of the article less arbitrary POV have failed. Rather than a single article that groups ROC and PRC together, separate articles should exist that reflect the groupings within the source material. Readin (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the templates should be based on the TES-QS classification, which differentiate Taiwan and China, and not on an arbitrary and non-neutral classification. Also I think it's more useful to have the universities sorted by location rather than language. Laurent (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: We should not create template for college rankings (from publications). There are many college rankings, and there is absolutely no need to make specific templates for these kind of rankings. Users also has to constantly update them, which makes it very inconvenient. This template should be deleted, as should this one Template:THES - QS World University Ranking - Taiwan as well, and do not recreate such college rankings templates.--Balthazarduju (talk) 00:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Balthazarduju. I don't see the need for this THES-QS templates at all. Readin (talk) 15:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Will Young singles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 13:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Will Young singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is redundant to Template:Will Young, which isn't big enough to be split into two templates. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 10:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.