Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 21

< July 20	July 22 >

July 21 edit

Template:SI mechanics units edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SI mechanics units (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer employed in any useful fashion. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 22:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Palmcare edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Palmcare (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox for a non-notable group of doctors, none of whom will need an article in the foreseeable future. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Only one working link in the navbox. - Masonpatriot (talk) 19:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, now no working links. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 06:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is just the tip of the iceberg. This editor needs to be reigned in. I have filed a report at ANI. Brangifer (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sorry for the problems, when i made this template i din not think much of it, but now it is bad and not notable at all. Sorry..Pedro thy master (talk • contribs) 17:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.