January 13 edit

Template:Video float (off-site) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 03:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Video float (off-site) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:EL. External links belong in the external links section, not inlined like our own free content. This template is an invitation to link to copyright violations (youtube etc), as well as giving unnecessary prominence to external resources. Unused (was used inappropriately in one article, that I removed). Delete. Happymelon 22:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete External links shouldn't be presented in such a way. They belong in the section created for them or as references. hmwithτ 22:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ethnic groups in Switzerland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. hmwithτ 22:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ethnic groups in Switzerland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, all the links point to one page. Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 07:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WorksofRay edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G7 Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 01:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WorksofRay (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template, created in December 2006, is a virtually exact duplicate of Template:Works of Satyajit Ray created by the same editor four-and-a-half months earlier, in July 2006.—Roman Spinner (talk) 05:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • That must have been some kind of mistake by me (creating two templates which are effectively the same). There is no need of this one. Please Delete. Thanks.--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2008-09 Rutgers Scarlet Knights season game log edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 03:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008-09 Rutgers Scarlet Knights season game log (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is nothing in it and it's not really necessary. ~Richmond96 tc 02:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete A log like that doesn't need a template. The log can simply be written in the article. hmwithτ 22:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.