January 1 edit

Template:Angels Barnstar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 00:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Angels Barnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We have more than enough barnstars, both general and specific. This one is unused and the image it originally contained has been removed as non-free. I fail to see the need to keep it. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 22:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I see that substitution is intended, accounting for the lack of transclusions. However, seeing as the image is dead and we already have enough barnstars, I still see no real use for this. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 22:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G2 Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 00:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ali F. Bilir edit

Template:Ali F. Bilir (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; hardcoded section of an infobox, has no use that I can see. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 22:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Taylor Horn edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Taylor Horn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links. Two albums and one song, each already linked to from each other. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 21:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom - not enough links to justify a navigation template. Terraxos (talk) 01:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Add To Category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Add To Category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not substantially edited since 2006, unused and I see no real use for it. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 15:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Adams, Davis and Young family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Edgar181 per criterion G7 (author request). Gavia immer (talk) 16:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adams, Davis and Young family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused large and unwieldy template. I see no real encyclopedic use as it would most likely take up more space than any article it was used in! RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 15:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Powerpuff Girls edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy close. Consensus to keep was reached less than 2 weeks ago. JPG-GR (talk) 19:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Powerpuff Girls (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Almost all content has been redirected to a characters or episodes page, so in reality this only links to five pages. Not enough content in my opinion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 02:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - You already nominated this template less then a month ago. See the discussion here where the consensus was to keep. This nom is too early. Garion96 (talk) 15:34, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.