Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 August 15

< August 14	August 16 >

August 15 edit

Template:Noteditedleftwikipedia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Noteditedleftwikipedia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardly a needed template, redundant to {{not around}}. See accompanying CfD here. Dylan 620 (contribs, logs)^{help us!} 23:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Redundant and unnecessary. PC78 (talk) 15:58, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --RL0919 (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No useful purpose, and not used on any page. (NB: Template was created by sockpuppet of persistent vandal.) JamesBWatson (talk) 10:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MAS*H navigation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:M*A*S*H navigation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely unnecessary. All articles use Infobox episode whixh has a previous/next field. Magioladitis (talk) 20:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --RL0919 (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. --Conti|✉ 21:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Norman Osborn edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Norman Osborn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Even though they collapse, nesting 7 other navboxes makes this a very, very overblown template. Removing them makes it all but unneeded. J Greb (talk) 20:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there seem to be some very loose associations going on here. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 23:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have no problem with the size of the template per se, but I agree with the comment above that it includes a lot of tenuous connections. I can't see where this would be useful. PC78 (talk) 12:24, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I fail to see the utility in a navbox to hold 7 navboxes, versus 7 collapsed navboxes. -Sharp962 (talk) 03:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox profile edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox profile (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{Infobox user}}. Only instance has been substituted. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 15:28, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. PC78 (talk) 11:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --RL0919 (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete and merge any critical new features with {{infobox}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

~~Unused~~ Unecessary fork of {{Infobox}}; see the latter's talk page for discussion. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 14:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the {{TFD}} template. I hope that was the correct thing to do. This template is transcluded on over 800 pages now primarily because it is used by {{Infobox Protected area}}. I slipped up and the Protected area template had been transcluded from a duplicate of this template in my user space. I would be very happy if the templates Infobox2 and Infobox could be merged but I see no possibility at this time. That could change if we could work together. I'll make an attempt. –droll [chat]

I've restored it, as that's not the proper way to go about this. Why is this separate template needed, do you think? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Sorry I removed the notice. I have not dealt with an issue like this before. Right now they are are not interchangeable but it has been some time since I reviewed the Infobox template and it has evolved so that my original proposal has been implemented after multiple requests (if I remember correctly). I don't have the time to see what would need to change right away but I'll get on it soon. Please do not delete this template until I or another editor has reviewed the issues with care. If you could put this issue on hold for about a week it would be very thoughtful of you. –droll [chat]

Keep for now. –droll [chat]
I'm inclined to say delete, though obviously a solution would need to be implemented first. Maintaining a substantial duplicate of {{infobox}} for the sake of a single template seems extremely counterproductive. PC78 (talk) 12:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps {{Infobox2}} should - for now - be subst in that one template? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Already been done, so this template is no longer used. I see no other obstacle to deletion. PC78 (talk) 22:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Based on the udpates above, this template is now unused and redundant. --RL0919 (talk) 22:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. {{Infobox Protected area}} can be converted to use {{infobox}} with little effort. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GGW edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unused and redundant. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GGW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replaced by {{Gold Glove}}; no longer serves a purpose with the recent re-formatting of these lists complete. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Mughal Emperor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per WP:CSD#T3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Mughal Emperor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 11:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete under criteria T3. Duplicates {{Infobox Monarch}} --Cybercobra (talk) 21:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Religious person edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unused and redundant. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Religious person (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox religious biography}}. Unused. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 11:00, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. PC78 (talk) 15:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unused and redundant to a better, more widely used template. --RL0919 (talk) 19:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox OSS developer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unused and redundant to {{infobox person}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox OSS developer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly specific. Used only twice. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 10:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Haystack edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G8 (dependent on a deleted page). Bencherlite ^Talk 19:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Haystack (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Talk page template for a deleted WikiProject. cesarb (talk) 01:40, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Dependant on a non-existant Wikiproject. PC78 (talk) 16:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --RL0919 (talk) 16:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox BPM edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox BPM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

marked as "Inactive". Unused. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 00:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commnet marked as historical, and probably likely to be used in historical versions of articles... 76.66.192.144 (talk) 04:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There was only one tansclusion, on an archive talk page, which I've subst. The template is, as stated above, unused. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 19:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see any value in retaining this template. PC78 (talk) 01:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Buddhist teacher edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unused and redundant. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Buddhist teacher (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Proposed in 2006, but still unused. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 00:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funny I should find this now. This is heavily used on ja.wikipedia and I'm going to start putting it on all the pages I've created. Shii (tock) 04:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nevermind, I'll just make Template:Infobox Buddhist and translate directly. Shii (tock) 04:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Why will {{Infobox religious biography}} (whose documentation uses a Buddhist monk as an example) not suffice? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:07, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - It doesn't have, for example, school, sect, subsect, posthumous name, birth name... Shii (tock) 14:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Then perhaps, rather than starting a new template, and thereby increasing the maintenance overhead, the existing one should be improved? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 14:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        I don't know how these projects work, I'm just translating from the useful Japanese template. Shii (tock) 14:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.