Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 5

< September 4	September 6 >

September 5 edit

Template:Virtua Fighter character edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Virtua Fighter character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, likely due to notability issues. Pagra shtak 18:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unlikely to be used in future due to transcluding articles having been deleted, and it's likely that an existing solution (such as {{Namco character}}) could be jury-rigged to work in its place. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

--

Template:Pokemon character edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:46, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pokemon character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, likely due to notability issues. Pagra shtak 18:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and redundant to Template:Pokémon character. PC78 (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant to existing template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User WikiProject Nintendo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was redirect to {{User Nintendo task force}} Pagra shtak 22:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User WikiProject Nintendo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template that has just been replaced by a new template due to the WikiProject's transition to a task force under WikiProject Video games. MuZemike (talk) 17:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why not redirect it to the new template, then? Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 02:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to reflect taskforce status. -- Ned Scott 03:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:QA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Pagra shtak 22:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recently created, only used in two articles. DYK on the main page is one thing, but is this the sort of thing we should be adding to articles? It doesn't seem like the sort of thing that should be used in a serious, professional encyclopedia article. PC78 (talk) 16:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, though it might make for a great idea for an opt-in user script kind of thing, as I think userscripts targeted at readers have a great amount of untapped potential. I'm fine with deletion. -- Ned Scott 03:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PeerNavbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:52, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PeerNavbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer in use, doesn't seem to have been used in over 2 years. All uses have been replaced with standard templates as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization/Templates. Bazj (talk) 14:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not used, not needed. Craigy (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom.
–Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 18:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Deprecated back in 2006 and kept around for historical purposes. Mackensen (talk) 21:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sure, though sniff, it's been a while since those heady days when we invented "NavBoxes". :-) James F. (talk) 07:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Yeah, I remember those days... ugen64 (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:20, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Ardric47 (talk) 22:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant to newer navboxes. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I am being redundant, but not as much as the template in question. Waltham, The Duke of 00:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bobby Hamilton Racing-Virginia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Pagra shtak 22:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bobby Hamilton Racing-Virginia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

nn Template. Links do not go to pages that are not already linked on the main article page, many are red links. D-Day (talk) 12:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Pages really aren't associated with each other, most are red links anyway. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Amanda Bynes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Amanda Bynes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Consensus was determined quite some time ago that templates that only contain actor roles weren't acceptable per determination of WP:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. This template only appears on the Amanda Bynes article, which already contains the recommented filmography table. This template serves no navigation purpose that isn't already offered on the article page and is redundant. Wildhartlivie (talk) 12:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete as per above Mspraveen (talk) 14:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why delete this template? This template also appears on other Amanda Bynes' film article, such as Big Fat Liar or She's the Man. This template does serves an navigation purpose. Please check! Veeboy (talk) 04:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per established precedent. PC78 (talk) 14:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per nom - doing so for all notable actors in films/TV programs, or even the "main" ones, would lead to horrible template clutter. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 15:45, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per nom. Actor templates are generally frowned upon. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:25, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 05:44, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this template ought to be deleted, why aren't templates like Template:FredandGinger or Template:Eleanor Powell deleted? I see no different between these and the Amanda Bynes Template. Veeboy (talk) 08:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then put them up for deletion. Wikipedia's a collaborative piece. You can't expect Wildhartlivie to do all the housekeeping. Bazj (talk) 08:52, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ram Charan Teja edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Pagra shtak 22:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ram Charan Teja (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Consensus was determined quite some time ago that templates that only contain actor roles weren't acceptable per determination of WP:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. This template only appears on the Ram Charan Teja article, which already contains the recommended filmography table. Further, the template contains one film, as does the filmography. This template serves no navigation purpose that isn't already offered on the article page and is redundant. Wildhartlivie (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete as per above. Mspraveen (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Keisha Castle-Hughes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Pagra shtak 22:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Keisha Castle-Hughes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Consensus was determined quite some time ago that templates that only contain actor roles weren't acceptable per determination of WP:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. This template only appears on the Keisha Castle-Hughes article, which already contains the recommended filmography table. This template serves no navigation purpose that isn't already offered on the article page and is redundant. Wildhartlivie (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete as per above Mspraveen (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Succession box three to three edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Succession box three to three (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer in use. All uses have been replaced with standard templates as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization/Templates. Bazj (talk) 11:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom.
–Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 18:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as for PeerNavBox. James F. (talk) 07:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Ardric47 (talk) 22:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination.--Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 05:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is a better template doing the job. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is becoming increasingly difficult for me to find new things to say in these deletions. The {{s-start}} system does a much better job than this; delete. Waltham, The Duke of 00:32, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikinfo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Pagra shtak 22:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikinfo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not in use, not likely to be in use. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete wikinfo is a red link, and I doubt anyone would copy info from it anyway given that it doesn't appear notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:25, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Adoniscik^{(t, c)} 05:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.