Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 23

< September 22	September 24 >

September 23 edit

Template:U.S. State Senate Majority Leaders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep delldot ∇. 00:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC) This template should be deleted because several articles included in the template are not those of U.S. State Senate Majority Leaders, and the template is essentially a duplicate of Template:U.S. State Treasurers. --TommyBoy (talk) 04:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I admit it is a duplicate, but at the same time it's a work in progress so please I can't always get around to everything--Jack Cox (talk) 16:31, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Please Jack Cox add db-author in the template since you agree it's a duplicate. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Keep. It's not a duplicate anymore. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: I've fixed up the list and it's no longer a duplicate so I'd like to ask TommyBoy if he could please drop the TFD request?--Jack Cox (talk) 00:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep, now that the redundancy issue has been solved, I no longer support deletion of the template. --TommyBoy (talk) 01:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

User:Patar knight/Template Sandbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted upon request of author. --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Patar knight/Template Sandbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Puts whatever page this template is on on a list for Category:Unassessed Military History articles ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line} 17:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this looks like an old work-in-progress (a template intended for the defunct WP:Fencing, based on the {{WPMILHIST}} one) which now turns up in Category:Unassessed military history articles as a result of recent changes to {{WPMILHIST}}. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 18:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'll go right ahead and put up a speedy-deletion request tag on it. When I ditched my wild goose chase of a fencing Wikiproject, I must have forgotten to delete it. Sorry for the confusion. --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Gunfighter edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 00:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Gunfighter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

~~Only six instances.~~ Redundant to {{Infobox Person}} ~~or {{Infobox Criminal}}~~. The "notable opponents" parameter ~~can be~~ [has been] added to the former. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 17:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: All instances now replaced. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as orphan infobox. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Meth lab edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 19:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Meth lab (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Provocative userbox of extremely narrow scope, used to indicate that a user is adept in performing what is in most places an illegal activity. Only used on the user page of its creator, and does not appear to have been created to aid in collaboration or anything constructive. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Per nom. Dzhugashvili (talk) 19:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Maharashtra Barnstar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep delldot ∇. 00:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Maharashtra Barnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The text uses other languages than English, which I think, is not acceptable. Shyam ^(T/C) 08:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If it was a template for the article space, then it would be pretty weird to have a template message in a language other than English, but this isn't an issue for barnstars. -- Ned Scott 09:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP It was created in July and out of sudden what the problem with it?? Its related to Maharashtra and Marathi language justifies it. and its not to put on Article page but on User page. It clearly says Awarded for excellent contribution for Project Maharashtra.--Suyogaerospace^{talk to me!} 08:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is used by WP:MAHA as an award for people who do good work for the project. --gppande «talk» 10:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Encourage translation No Wikiproject should give the appearance of being solely for a limited nationality. Taemyr (talk) 07:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.