Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 October 29

< October 28	October 30 >

October 29 edit

Template:Crashed aircraft infobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 09:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Crashed aircraft infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Unedited (for two years). Unloved. Unnecessary. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 20:34, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This unused template can be deleted. If it is necessary in future, it can be recreated. Ruslik (talk) 09:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unused and unmaintained. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:John Wayne edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 09:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:John Wayne (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is no precedent for creating templates such as this for each and every actor. Everything in this template should be covered in the article and not stuck in an otherwise arbitrary template at the foot of the article. Overall, biography articles are becoming cluttered with excessive templates and should only be created when there is a compelling reason. This one doesn't have a compelling reason. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This isn't for his work as a star, as you'll see by looking at the actual template - it's for his work as a director and a producer. For which there are a considerable amount of precedents. .... 02:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This one is justified , even as an exception if would be OK, but The fourdotelipsis explains it satisfactorily DGG (talk) 07:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.