Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 October 10

< October 9	October 11 >

October 10 edit

Template:BILru and Template:PIru edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Discussion can continue on the template talk pages --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 11:44, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BILru (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:PIru (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:OR and as per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(icons)#Inventing_new_icons. Their is no proven usage of this flag for the lions. Gnevin (talk) 23:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Flag and WP:RU have been informed for this discussion Gnevin (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Strong Keep - the flags depicted are rarely used because both teams don't play on a yearly basis but play every 2 years, the template should be kept and if there is a problem with the flags, ask at WP:RU ...--Comet styles 11:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can you prove the usage? I've never seen them, ever! Without the flag this template is pointlessGnevin (talk) 15:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am on the fence with respect to keep or delete, but have some additional information for other editors to consider. In both cases, I don't think the flags are ever directly stated to represent those teams (but perhaps there is an implicit statement). They are shortcuts, in a sense, of putting three or four flags next to these multi-national team names in match summaries. For example, instead of:

May 31 1980

South Africa	26 – 22	British and Irish Lions
Try: Louw c W. du Plessis c Van Heerden Germishuys c Serfontein Con: Botha (3)		Try: Price Pen: Ward (5) Drop Ward

Attendance: 38,170
Referee: F Palmade

One alternative would be:

May 31 1980

South Africa	26 – 22	British and Irish Lions
Try: Louw c W. du Plessis c Van Heerden Germishuys c Serfontein Con: Botha (3)		Try: Price Pen: Ward (5) Drop Ward

Attendance: 38,170
Referee: F Palmade

and another alternative would be no flag(s) at all. If you look at the Lions or Pacific Islanders rugby union team articles, you'll see that the bottom of the infoboxes have all four or three flags and not just these artificially combined images, so really, these templates are only being used for match and team results as a more compact form of the multiple flags. I think the question that needs to be answered in this TfD is which is the best representation of these multi-national teams in results tables:

images that combine 3 or 4 flags into one rectangle the same size as individual flags (current template usage)
show all 3 or 4 flags for these teams
use no flag images at all.

— Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep No logical reason to get rid of either. Use of four flags looks especially ridiculous Djln--Djln (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- PS The actual Lions flag is based on their shield which can be seen here British Lions site. Maybe the template design could be changed to this shield.Djln--Djln (talk) 16:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - That would have to be a free image for use in this template, and I'm not sure if someone holds copyright over that shield or not. The four individual elements are probably free for use, so an image author would have to create the combination in Inkscape by hand. We cannot just download the image from that website!! That's similar to what we did for Image:Flag of Ireland hockey team.svg. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we need any image ? Gnevin (talk) 19:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DegrassiCharAppearances edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 11:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DegrassiCharAppearances (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan and useless. Having a full list of episodes every character appeared is not the best for an infobox. Magioladitis (talk) 14:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary template, and unlikely to be used. Jor dan ^Contribs 14:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused, not needed. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 16:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No uses for it. —Mizu onna sango15^Hello! 20:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pages I recently deleted edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 11:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pages I recently deleted (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Speedy delete previously was declined. The template is unused and unlikely to be used. -- Suntag ☼ 22:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, admins may wanna put this on their user page just as a sort of service. ViperSnake151 13:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This template is just a link to a special page. Why someone not just add the link and prefer to use a template? Besides that, none is using it!-- Magioladitis (talk) 23:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Locobot (talk) 01:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC) --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 10:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unlikely to be used, possibly redundant template. Jor dan ^Contribs 14:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no harm done in keeping it, but it doesn't serve any purpose that a simple link couldn't do. —Mizu onna sango15^Hello! 20:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dynasty character edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result was Speedy delete by an admin (non-admin closure). Magioladitis (talk) 23:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dynasty character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template I created is now unused and obsolete, replaced by {{Infobox soap character}} — TAnthony^Talk 04:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC) — TAnthony^Talk 04:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect since there's an off chance the old template may be applied by accident. - J Greb (talk) 10:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as we do with all redundant templates. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No longer needed. Jor dan ^Contribs 14:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Degrassi character edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 11:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Degrassi character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox character}} Magioladitis (talk) 00:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Template is unused, having been rendered obsolete and replaced by {{Infobox character}}. — TAnthony^Talk 06:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete general template covers everything. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect since there's an off chance the old template may be applied by accident. - J Greb (talk) 10:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's common tactic to delete redundant templates. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This template has been replaced, and no longer has any use. Jor dan ^Contribs 14:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This template is not in use, and has been superceded by {{Infobox character}}. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 15:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.