Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 May 3

< May 2	May 4 >

May 3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 08:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Survtwice edit

For reasons below on Template:Survnovote; fancruft, unlikely to expand significantly, only linked together based on trivia — Irk _{Come in for a drink!} 05:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, shouldn't be a template, or a list for that matter. Seems like a useless bit of trivia which would be deleted from an article. weburiedoursecrets inthegarden 14:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Crufty, very crufty. Overtriviaitis. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 00:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the contestant left in a special way, it is already in their article (if notable) or in the season article. Therefore, template not needed. -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 07:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This information doesn't belong in Wikipedia, much less an infobox here. This is trivia; fancruft, just like people above me said. It doesn't belong in articles because it is trivia, and it doesn't belong in an infobox because that's not it's primary purpose. – Obento Musubi (C • G • S) 06:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete incredibly trivial connection between these links; not useful for navigation. Maralia (talk) 02:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Survnovote edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the contestants don't have their own Wikipedia pages; unlikely to significantly expand and based entirely on trivia — Irk _{Come in for a drink!} 05:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my above reasoning. weburiedoursecrets inthegarden 14:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 00:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the contestant left in a special way, it is already in their article (if notable) or in the season article. Therefore, template not needed. -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 07:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Like I said above, this is fancruft material that does not deserve its own infobox. If an infobox is wanted so badly, then the author should create an infobox of all Survivor contestants with little notes saying "Never voted off" or "Appeared twice but voted off once". This is certainly not notable enough to stand in its own infobox. – Obento Musubi (C • G • S) 06:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per above because this template has separate articles. -- 03:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Trivial intersection between these people; navigation aid unnecessary. Maralia (talk) 02:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's trivial information and it's not even helpful. "Being voted out once" captures far too many different outcomes in the show to be meaningful. Hydrahead (talk) 21:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Correction: I meant "not being voted out", not "being voted out once". See, this is how confusing this stuff is! Hydrahead (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.