Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 May 16

< May 15	May 17 >

May 16 edit

Template:Death date and 81 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete Yannismarou (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary template. See Johnadamsfanatic45's contributions. — For An Angel (talk) 12:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - prose in a template created for use in one article. Useless, this can simply be added into relevant articles manually. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 20:24, May 16, 2008 (UTC)
Delete - per nom. Cheers. _{Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond} 04:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Immediately - The template didn't even make sense in the first place because it was based on a math error, so it shouldn't have been created at all. - Darthjarek (talk) 16:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – as per all of the above. Jared Preston (talk) 12:11, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - totally useless. --Aervanath's signature is boring 12:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User Shia 3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Userfy to User:Richard0612/Userbox Archive/User Shia 3 Happy‑melon 19:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This one is the same as User Shia 1 and User shia.--BigDevil ^Talk 20:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moderate keep While it may be fairly close to {{User shia}}, personally when I look for userboxes for my userpage, I $like to have several to choose from that are slightly different. If it's not identical, why does it hurt to have? Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 20:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is identical and not useful. The way of wording them is different which has the same meaning.--BigDevil ^Talk 20:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy It is NOT identical to {{User Shia}} OR {{User Shia 2}}, but religious userboxes belong in userspace.--Aervanath's signature is boring 19:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy It's the personal version of Shia 1, and different enough in intended meaning not to delete it. Notice that (Shia 3) adds that this is the true philosophy of Islam, a non-neutral meaning that Shia 1 doesn't have at all. As a non-neutral statement, it shouldn't be on template space. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.