Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 March 6

March 6 edit

Template:LondonMonopolyBoard edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was subst and delete. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this is a copyright / trademark issue. Per the Hasbro website [1] MONOPOLY®, THE DISTINCTIVE DESIGN OF THE GAME BOARD, THE FOUR CORNER SQUARES, AS WELL AS EACH OF THE DISTINCTIVE ELEMENTS OF THE BOARD AND THE PLAYING PIECES ARE TRADEMARKS OF HASBRO, INC. FOR ITS REAL ESTATE TRADING GAME AND GAME EQUIPMENT. ©1935, 1936, 1947, 1951, 1952, 1954, 1961, 1973, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 HASBRO, INC... Slavlin (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Subst. I believe the phrase "distinctive elements" refers to the pictures and fonts, such as the little guy in jail or Rich Uncle Pennybags. Lovelac 7 05:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am more worried about the "DISTINCTIVE DESIGN OF THE GAME BOARD" than the elements of the board. Slavlin (talk) 17:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 22:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subst Fair use for Monopoly (game), which is now the only article to use it; why is this a template? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I still think the information is well within our right to use, but since this isn't used anywhere but the Monopoly article, I'm changing my vote to subst (see above). Lovelac 7 03:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Subst or move to Monopoly (game)/subspace for easier management. -- Fullstop (talk) 15:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AtlanticCityMonopolyBoard edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was subst and delete. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this is a copyright / trademark issue. Per the Hasbro website [2] MONOPOLY®, THE DISTINCTIVE DESIGN OF THE GAME BOARD, THE FOUR CORNER SQUARES, AS WELL AS EACH OF THE DISTINCTIVE ELEMENTS OF THE BOARD AND THE PLAYING PIECES ARE TRADEMARKS OF HASBRO, INC. FOR ITS REAL ESTATE TRADING GAME AND GAME EQUIPMENT. ©1935, 1936, 1947, 1951, 1952, 1954, 1961, 1973, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 HASBRO, INC.. Slavlin (talk) 04:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Subst. I believe the phrase "distinctive elements" refers to the pictures and fonts, such as the little guy in jail or Rich Uncle Pennybags. Lovelac 7 05:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am more worried about the "DISTINCTIVE DESIGN OF THE GAME BOARD" than the elements of the board. Slavlin (talk) 17:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 22:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subst Fair use for Monopoly (game), which is now the only article to use it; why is this a template? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I still think the information is well within our right to use, but since this isn't used anywhere but the Monopoly article, I'm changing my vote to subst (see above). Lovelac 7 03:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Radio stations by format (in the United States) templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 04:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hopelessly incomplete template, little chance this will ever be maintained to the point it will be useful. These formats are already categorized. Rtphokie (talk) 14:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hadn't we already concluded at WP:WPRS that sorting stations over a great region by format is kinda like sorting every food by color - it provides no navigational use whatsoever. JPG-GR (talk) 18:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:YouTubeproj edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete per creator Woohookitty^Woohoo! 09:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no YouTube wikiproject. The creator of this banner added it to Talk:Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon (diff1, diff2). JD554 (talk) 10:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I made it so I can help... Sorry for the inconvenience... Togepi 987 (talk) 05:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.