Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 17

< June 16	June 18 >

June 17 edit

Template:BDSM dictionary edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. --- RockMFR 18:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BDSM dictionary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:DICTIONARY. That and there's nothing in this template. Millbrooky (talk) 18:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-per WP:DICTIONARY and WP:BLANK, and per not being used.--SRX^--^Latino Heat 21:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A search shows it in use on at least this page where the use appears reasonable as a way to document the attribution history of content brought into the encyclopedia from another GFDL-compliant source. You might make an argument that the page it's used on is a mere definition but I don't see how WP:WINAD applies to the template. I'm also not sure why the commenter above thinks it's blank. I see content clearly. I'm not sure the template is all that useful but I don't see a reason to delete it either. Keep unless a better justification for deletion is given. Rossami (talk) 22:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes, I created it to document copying material from another site. I actually also used it elsewhere but used subst so you may not realise what I did.--Whipmaster (talk) 12:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gal to l edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete Happy‑melon 17:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The template doesn't work since it tries to call a non-existant subpage. It isn't worth fixing since {{convert}} will do the job. It has only one transclusion & that's on user talk archive. JIMp_talk·cont 02:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, and redundant to an existing template. Terraxos (talk) 00:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nabla (talk) 18:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting: How about {{L to gal}}? Probably better to consider both, for symmetry. - Nabla (talk) 18:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I do like symmetry, however, there are a couple of asymmetries in this case.
  1. {{L to gal}} works whereas {{gal to l}} doesn't.
  2. {{L to gal}} converts to both gallons whereas {{gal to l}} apparently was to assume the imperial one.
  3. {{L to gal}} was created by me & {{gal to l}} was a failed attempt at copying me.
  The third point means that the template can be {{db-g7}}ed. So how about it? There are two symmetries in this case.
  a. Both are redundant to {{convert}}.
  b. Neither are used (I've just seen to that).
  Yes, let's delete {{l to gal}} for symmetry ... for tidying up.
  JIMp_talk·cont 17:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Both templates are completely redundant. All conversions should be done with {{convert}}. Roguegeek (talk) 18:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment—I've put {{L to gal}} up for speedy deletion under G7. JIMp_talk·cont 18:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Deprecate through redirect, not deletion. Rossami (talk) 22:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A redirect would make no sense to the user because the redirect would go to {{convert}} which, in turn, would require the convert-from unit (i.e. "impgal", "USgal" or "U.S.gal") and the convert-to unit (i.e. "L" or "l") to be specified explicitely whereas with all of these {{x to y}} conversion templates the x and y are, naturally, taken as givens. Moreover, as I understand it, the point of deprecation through a redirect is allow users to adjust to a new way of doing things. There is no need for such adjustment in this case since the template has never worked. JIMp_talk·cont 00:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This template could go under WP:SPEEDY#T3.
- It's not employed in any useful fashion, it can't be since it doesn't work.
- If it did work it would be a hardcoded instance of {{convert}} which provides the same functionality.

JIMp_talk·cont 01:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:As the World Turns character edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:As the World Turns character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan template. Infobox soap character does the same job and in a better way. Magioladitis (talk) 11:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant to {{Infobox soap character}} and unused. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 13:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-redundant variation of the {{Infobox soap character}}, like Juliancolton said, it is also unused.--SRX^--^Latino Heat 21:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above statements. Liashi (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CvMrB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G6. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CvMrB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused personal warning template of a retired user. Not in current schema. MBisanz ^talk 07:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - actually, it is in use with Wiki's WP:AWB, per User:Pb30/AWB subst. Unless it is not used in AWB anymore, it can be deleted, but now it is in scheme.--SRX^--^Latino Heat 21:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The AWB schema is merely a list of all templates, so AWB picks them up when it scans pages. Whenever a template is red-linked on that page, it is removed from the page. Since AWB scrapes that page each time it loads to know which templates to subst, there will be no lag issues. MBisanz ^talk 21:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or userfy, we have lots of non-standard warning templates. -- Ned Scott 06:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nn-test2MrB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G6. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nn-test2MrB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused personal warning template of a retired user. Not in current schema. MBisanz ^talk 07:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or userfy, we have lots of non-standard warning templates. -- Ned Scott 06:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Comment2MrB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G6. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Comment2MrB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused personal warning template of a retired user. Not in current schema. MBisanz ^talk 07:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or userfy, we have lots of non-standard warning templates. -- Ned Scott 06:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-PCL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Moved to {{PCL}}, content modified, all transclusions supplemented with {{PD-author}}. Happy‑melon 19:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is no longer considered to be a valid license tag on commons. See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-PCL. Pleases rename as Template:PCL which can be used as a source tag but images tagged only with this template should be considered not to have a license. /Lokal _Profil 10:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC) --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Isn't this really a rename request? --Thetrick (talk) 14:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. It would also require the deletion (or no license tagging) of all images tagged with this template and no other license template. /Lokal _Profil 19:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:POV-SPA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:POV-SPA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that seems to suffer excessively from WP:SELFREF The Evil Spartan (talk) 04:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete making judgements as to the nature of those who are editing the article does nothing to improve the situation. Viridae ^Talk 06:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No reason to have the self reference in there. -- Ned Scott 06:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wrongsummary1MrB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G6. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wrongsummary1MrB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused personal warning template of a retired user. Not in current schema. MBisanz ^talk 02:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy -- Ned Scott 06:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Spam2MrB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G6. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spam2MrB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused personal warning template of a retired user. Not in current schema. MBisanz ^talk 02:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy -- Ned Scott 06:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Test2articleMrB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G6. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Test2articleMrB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused personal warning template of a retired user. Not in current schema. MBisanz ^talk 02:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy -- Ned Scott 06:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Test2aMrB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G6. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Test2aMrB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused personal warning template of a retired user. Not in current schema. MBisanz ^talk 02:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy -- Ned Scott 06:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tpv2MrB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted under CSD G6. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tpv2MrB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused personal warning template of a retired user. Not in current schema. MBisanz ^talk 02:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy -- Ned Scott 06:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.