Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 July 5

< July 4	July 6 >

July 5 edit

Template:NatureDispute edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NatureDispute (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obsolete template, not used in any pages, all errors apparently corrected. MBisanz ^talk 21:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, see also the cfd from 2006-01-15. JackSchmidt (talk) 19:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, refers to a 2005 Nature article, no longer in use. NJGW (talk) 03:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Don't pasken edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted by User:Gwen Gale under WP:CSD#G7. Non-admin closure. iced kola^(Mmm...) 20:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Don't pasken (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We don't have spoiler's in articles, and this is only used on one talk page, so it is overly specific as a general warning template. MBisanz ^talk 21:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per precedence on not having warning templates. MessedRocker (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Everything there is covered by Wikipedia:General disclaimer, to which every single page in Wikipedia has a direct link. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 21:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As creator, I see no usefulness, and its not fitting with Wikipedias disclaimers policy, hence the delete vote. -Reuvenk_{T C} 06:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:September discography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:20, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:September discography (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a redundant template of Template:September and is not being used. — Wolfer68 (talk) 20:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Thetrick (talk) 18:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. NJGW (talk) 03:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OnePiece edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OnePiece (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The OnePiece wikia does not meet any of the WP:EL guidelines. Linking to it should not be encouraged through this sort of template nor does it meet the base templates guidelines. Such a template gives an air of legitimacy and approval to a wikia that has neither. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If if needs to be linked, people can use {{wikia}} on an individual basis rather than a half-cooked and nonstandard template which implies sisterhood. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nominator's lucid rationale. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Cris C., implies some sort of connection between wikipedia and a commercial wiki. NJGW (talk) 03:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:정보표 인물 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was already deleted by The Anome (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)}. Non-admin closure. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 21:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:정보표 인물 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Foreign-language template that was created for transclusion in an article itself in a foreign language. Not serving any purpose, as the article in question is tagged for speedy deletion (a7). — Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 18:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Spain Close Up edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spain Close Up (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by {{Spain topics}}. Unused for about 6 months. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 16:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. iced kola^(Mmm...) 20:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete has links that perhaps should be merged, but is unused and replaced. NJGW (talk) 03:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Spam-i edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete per no objections. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spam-i (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Self admitted duplicate of {{Uw-spam2}}, anything useful can be merged with variables. MBisanz ^talk 06:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The purpose was to have a shortcut that allows to put a record of the spam domain in the message for later searches; a function which couldn't be added to spam2 without overloading its existing default parameters. I used this one a lot myself, but I don't know if it ever caught on with anybody else. No objections from here. Femto (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.