Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 December 7

< December 6	December 8 >

December 7 edit

Template:Airlines of Ireland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Will redirect to the fuller template in case where it applies--User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 12:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Airlines of Ireland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is redundant to a better-designed template: Template:Airlines of the Republic of Ireland. Funandtrvl (talk) 20:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one or the other - redundant, yes. Better-designed, meh. //roux 13:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Redundant and the other version seems to be the superior one. bahamut0013 ♠♣ 17:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with the above. Can the list be made to "float" in the middle of the template? Sardanaphalus (talk) 11:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: What do you mean float in the middle of the template? Peachey88 ^{(Talk Page | Contribs)} 01:26, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd forgotten how to do it, but have now remembered. It's not the list that would be {{float}}ed but the flag:

Sardanaphalus (talk) 02:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - other version may not be "better designed", but it is more complete. Sorry, don't know how to make stuff "float" yet!! Original author has been notified, but no response as of yet...--Funandtrvl (talk) 17:34, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Huf Haus edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETED. Postdlf (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial, Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) -Technosenior (talk) 20:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Technosenior has confused the article Huf Haus for a template and nominated it for deletion as such. In doing so they have managed to create a template called Template:Huf Haus. This should probably be fixed by an admin who knows what to do. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:05, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Christina Aguilera singles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep This has been open nine days and no one's objecting, so I'm closing it. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Christina Aguilera singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Aguilera already has a template, there is no reason for her to have two. All of this info can easily be placed in her main template (and her album links are are duplicated between both). eo (talk) 12:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Her navbox and the singles navbox are about related but separate things. Rolling this template into her navbox would make something large and unwieldy. //roux 15:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Singles templates should be separated if size calls for it. Merging this to Christina's template would either a.) require more rows than the template can handle or b.) make a large, unwieldy template. (George Strait has had so many singles that I had to make three singles templates.) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 13:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - understood, but what has happened now is that both of her templates are on all Aguilera-related pages. So why is it better to have two templates on all of her pages when we can just use one? She really doesn't have that many singles, it doesn't make sense. - eo (talk) 13:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then remove it from the non-single articles. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Future Series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 12:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Future Series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicated by {{Future television series}}. Transcended to one article which is currently at AFD. Farix (Talk) 01:09, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - redundant. //roux 15:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Delete - The template in question merely says "series", while the template being duplicated says "television series"... Would there ever be a circumstance where "series" would be more appropriate than "TV Series"? If no, then Delete. bahamut0013 ♠♣ 17:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.