December 5 edit

Template:Jimmy Giuffre edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Wizardman 05:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jimmy Giuffre (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Just a few albums and mostly redlinks Cosprings (talk) 01:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Even though this currently has only six blue links, most of the red links are of a valid subject, and articles can easily be written on almost all of these albums (as albums by notable artists are generally notable in their own right). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 19:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Assuming the redlinked albums are notable, then this template is a keeper. I'd hate to see any sort of content deleted just for the existance of red links. Even without the red links, a navbox with six entries is a valid navigational aid (though six is close to the borderline for me). bahamut0013 17:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.