Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 December 15

< December 14	December 16 >

December 15 edit

Template:Alexandra Burke edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 11:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alexandra Burke (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This seems a bit premature for someone whose debut single only went on sale yesterday. I've removed some of the more irrelevant links as well as a few redirects, and it doesn't leave an awful lot. PC78 (talk) 00:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough for a template yet. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have added some articles to the template. Sony BMG and Syco are Burke's record lables, Simon Cowell is the person who signed her. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.131.189 (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still not enough. In my opinion it needs to be used on at least five pages, and using it on Simon Cowell et al. wouldn't be a smart idea. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that once she gains popularity, we should have a template; until then, we should delete it until we have more information. --Flashflash; (talk) 07:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Until yesterday she was hardly a public figure. The template seems rushed and doesn't hold enough use at this stage. There simply aren't enough articles related to her. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggt500 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is almost inevitable she will be number one and will bring out an Album so the template may as well be kept for when this happens. 安東尼 TALK ^圣诞快乐 17:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst this is true, it hasn't happened yet and may not happen for a long time. Also, you're correct that it isn't inevitable, it's just people's current prediction. ggt500 20:00, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - premature; fails WP:CRYSTAL (yes, she almost certainly well release a studio album, but we can't be sure of that until it actually exists). For now, we don't need this template. Terraxos (talk) 17:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:CRYSTAL, premature. ATMarsden^{Talk · {Semi-Retired}} 18:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete premature. Sceptre ^(talk) 17:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Yes, it's true that it's a tad premature, however I personally think that it is almost a certianty that she will release an album, and we might as well keep it. Also, all the other X Factor Winners apart from Steve Brookstien have thier own templates, and they have barely more information that Alexandra's does. Anikin3 ^(talk) 18:41, 16 December 2008 (GMT)
Keep as she will certainly release an album (she just won the X Factor and is guaranteed a record deal by law!) JS (chat) 23:12, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see the purpose of this now. It might as well be redirected to the X-Factor one. All reasons seem to violate WP:CRYSTAL, no - murder it. --➨Candlewicke ^{:) Sign/Talk} 21:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.