Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 October 7

< October 6	October 8 >

October 7 edit

Template:Konjiki no Gash Bell navigation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 21:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A POV fork created by someone who is convinced that the American dub of this anime (Zatch Bell!) is the devil incarnate. Has been unilaterally creating Japanese-version pages without reaching anything close to consensus. — JuJube 20:11, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete: PoV forks are the real devil incarnate around here. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 13:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or redirect) as completely redundant to {{Zatch Bell navigation}}, which has a more appropriate name because it is consistent with the title of the article (Zatch Bell!). Melsaran (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Virginia Beach Mariners squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 21:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Current squad template for a team that no longer exists. — ArtVandelay13 20:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ArtVandelay13 20:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obsolete (further suggestion: subst into main article, and edit its content to show the final lineup.) — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 13:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the main article has a final squad list, so this shouldn't be needed. ArtVandelay13 15:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obsolete and unused per nom. Information is retained in the article anyway. Woodym555 15:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obsolete. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 16:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Dfrg.msc 00:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Seoul Subway Information edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 21:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to {{Infobox SMS station}}. — PC78 16:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obsolete. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 13:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agreed. Carlosguitar 04:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wisconsin FM edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 21:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (in articles) template whose purpose is accomplished by numerous smaller templates found in Template:Wisconsin Radio Markets. — JPG-GR 05:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Replaced by more localized (and better looking) templates. Rocket000 06:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
comment - besides that, it's not entirely accurate. For example, I'm listening right now to WORT which is at 89.9, but this template connects that frequency only to WWSP. If this template is kept, it will need to be updated. Slambo (Speak) 14:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Asof edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete under G7. Non-admin closure. Carlosguitar 20:02, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No work on it since January. I don't think it's needed anyway.. Rocket000 05:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Appears to be an abandoned work-in-progress. JPG-GR 05:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete as author. The discussion this was created for never picked up. —Random832 06:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why isn't this taken care of yet?

Because the author didn't put {{db-author}} on it, of course. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 13:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obsolete. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 13:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RadioNC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 21:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template whose purpose is already accomplished by Template:USRadio, which itself is being phased out. — JPG-GR 00:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rocket000 06:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Template:USRadio. Carlosguitar 11:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Query: The above does not appear to be an entirely solid deletion rationale; if Template:USRadio is itself obsolete or broken, then deleting other templates on the basis that {{USRadio}} exists doesn't make any sense. Did you mean to refer to something newer and better that is replacing {{USRadio}}? — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 13:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, this template is obsolete because of {{USRadio}}. Carlosguitar 03:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification Template:USRadio is slowly being replaced by Template:USRadio2. JPG-GR 04:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RadioSD edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Mike Peel 21:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template whose purpose is already accomplished by USRadio, which itself is being phased out. — JPG-GR 00:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rocket000 06:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Template:USRadio. Carlosguitar 11:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Query: The above does not appear to be an entirely solid deletion rationale; if Template:USRadio is itself obsolete or broken, then deleting other templates on the basis that {{USRadio}} exists doesn't make any sense. Did you mean to refer to something newer and better that is replacing {{USRadio}}? — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 13:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, this template is obsolete because of {{USRadio}}. Carlosguitar 03:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification Template:USRadio is slowly being replaced by Template:USRadio2. JPG-GR 04:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.