Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 October 16

< October 15	October 17 >

October 16 edit

Template:User butt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfy. — Malcolm (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This should not be on an encyclopedia. We are trying to write an encyclopedia, not a dating service. — -Sox 207 19:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ehm, it's a userbox saying "this user likes big butts", not "this user wants to have a date with you". It's a userbox that describes the user's personal preference, not a userbox that is used to use Wikipedia as a dating service. Melsaran (talk) 21:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it's a harmless userbox. We've had this type of discussion many times. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy per WP:UBM.Charon X/talk 17:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy per WP:UBM. JPG-GR 20:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy as per above. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Amnesty International Infobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was subst and delete. — Malcolm (talk) 00:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete Intended for only one article. szyslak 06:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom — yes, it does take up some space when editing the lead of the article, but the template namespace isn't meant to hide ugly syntax from one specific article. (From my analysis, it looks like {{Infobox Organization}} should work here as well). Gracenotes^T § 19:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per ample precedent that we shouldn't use templates for infoboxes for individual articles. It may take up some code, but creating a separate template is unnecessary. Melsaran (talk) 21:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete as per nom. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox city in ethiopia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 00:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and redundant. —MJCdetroit 03:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – it appears that this is a nonstandard infobox, and that it can be easily replaced by {{infobox city|subordinate name=Ethiopia}}. Melsaran (talk) 21:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. "Unused and redundant" says all you need to know. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant to {{Infobox Settlement}}. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there are better templates, like {{Geobox}} or {{Infobox Settlement}}. Tankred 18:23, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unneeded. _{Hydrogen Iodide} _(HI!) 21:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Darwinek 12:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Astrea class cruiser edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 00:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no 'Astrea' class; the class is properly 'Astraea' and a footer template already exists at Template:Astraea class cruiser (1893). — Maralia 01:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant--victor falk 17:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. It was my poor spelling which created it in the first place. -- Jll 08:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as having been superseded by the correctly spelled {{Astraea class cruiser (1893)}}. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. _{Hydrogen Iodide} _(HI!) 21:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Newark Ohio FM edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. — Malcolm (talk) 00:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Appears to be abandoned, as it has never been integrated into the greater Template:Ohio Radio Markets list nor has its clear counterpart Template:Newark Ohio AM been created. — JPG-GR 17:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and put in relevant articles. Lack of AM version is irrelevant, as this would provide at least some useful navigation. While it does seem to have been "abandoned" before article installation simply installing it into articles will notify enough active editors that it exists and needs to be maintained periodically (e.g. new/dead stations), and may well inspired creation of the AM version. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 13:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Malcolm (talk) 00:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per SMcCandlish. It will take some time to get this template up-to-speed, but it should be used. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as long as someone is willing to make the necessary changes, if not relist for deletion in six months. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.