Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 November 17

< November 16	November 18 >

November 17 edit

Various transport succession boxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:28, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These templates have all been superseded by the s-rail and s-line templates for railroad succession. All article space transclusions removed. Affected transit systems include the Copenhagen Metro, Washington Metro, Docklands Light Railway, Ontario Northland, and Virginia Railway Express. The relevant project pages have been updated. Mackensen (talk) 01:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. jj137 (Talk) 03:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all superceded categories. Doczilla (talk) 03:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Primary Schools of South Ayrshire edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This navigation template lists non-notable schools. All but one of the articles linked from there have either been deleted for non-notability, redirected, or have not existed in the first place. I suggest to delete the template. — B. Wolterding (talk) 16:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all redlinks but two, "see also" would work just as well in this case. SkierRMH (talk) 17:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Skier. All redlinks but two. jj137 (Talk) 03:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gymnast ru image edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This tag has several problems, first of all it's not rely a license tag in it's own right, it just links to the website the images where found at and asert that the website has given permission for the images to be used on Wikipedia but that a seperate license tag is required. Secondly I can find no indication that the website in question actualy hold the copyright to any of these photos, most of them seem to pre-date the interent, in fact if we had some better source info some of them might be PD, but all we know is that they where grabbed from this website, so we don't have a clue about the actual copyright status or source of the images. Fortunately it's only used on two images, so if anyone can dig up sufficinet license info go right ahead and salvage those, but this tag needs to go IMHO. --Sherool (talk) 11:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree with Sherool's assessment. --Iamunknown 15:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete standard non-free template should be used for this, with the "permission" put in the 'source' section of the rationale. SkierRMH (talk) 17:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per all of the above. jj137 (Talk) 03:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per above. -- RG ² 13:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the template, retag images if it's possible. Alex Spade (talk) 06:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Past South Park character edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleiton. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template is the same as Template:South Park character, only that it contains an additional parameter. This parameter has been added to Template:South Park character as an optional parameter. Check the Template:South Park character#Usage for more information about the modifications that have been made. — Armando.O^{talk • Ev} 03:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, as redundant. JPG-GR (talk) 06:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant w/ change to south park char template. And, it would have to be changed every time Kenny died ;) SkierRMH (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. jj137 (Talk) 03:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant template. And fiction is present. Doczilla (talk) 03:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The show remains available, and the writers can bring old characters back any time, so "past" is not meaningful. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's too similar to another template. Martin B (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template: VoteSmart edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 05:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template is now superfluous. It has been replaced by {{CongLinks}}. There are no articles that use {{VoteSmart}} anymore. —Markles 00:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aye. Not needed. --Ali'i (talk) 17:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant & superseded. SkierRMH (talk) 17:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per both of the above. jj137 (Talk) 03:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant, superceded template. Doczilla (talk) 03:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.