Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 May 4

< May 3	May 5 >

May 4 edit

Template:BTAS screenshot edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Nominated before, deletion suggested despite no input. // Pilotguy hold short 00:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template has no use anymore due to recent removals of all screenshots from episode lists on Wikipedia due to the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Removal of images from lists of episodes — 十八 07:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, the images were removed from the episode list, but they are used in the episode articles.--T-man, the wise 08:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these images were removed from the episode pages by OrphanBot due to "no source information." I'm not sure what source information is needed for a screenshot, since either way it is copyrighted and can be used only under a claim of fair use. Is it simply necessary to say "I took this screenshot from x media"? Incidentally, where did these come from, anyway? They look clear enough to have come from a DVD, but they're at odd resolutions that don't match either the native resolution of the DVD or any normal scaling ratio thereof. *** Crotalus *** 08:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Woohookitty^Woohoo! 09:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC) --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 09:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was

Template:Infobox Family Guy episode edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because the template is just a show specific fork of {{Infobox Television episode}}. All uses have been replaced. Jay32183 22:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Ned Scott 22:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, template mentioned is fine for the job. --Phoenix (talk) 16:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - cohesion 22:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Scorpion prinz ^{(Talk | contribs)} 03:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MelbourneBusCompany edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, redundant. Orderinchaos 11:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now redundant template, has been merged into Template:MelbournePublicTransport. — Thewinchester ^(talk) 17:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Thewinchester ^(talk) 17:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant. Jmlk17 20:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Orderinchaos 07:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MelbourneBuses edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, redundant. Orderinchaos 11:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now redundant template, has been merged into Template:MelbournePublicTransport. — Thewinchester ^(talk) 17:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Thewinchester ^(talk) 17:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant. Jmlk17 20:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Orderinchaos 07:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Phoenix (talk) 16:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Scorpion prinz ^{(Talk | contribs)} 03:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Portugal Squad 2004 European Football Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeete // Pilotguy hold short 00:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 August 11, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football etc - squad templates are kept for only champions, World Cup finals and current squads. — Ytny (talk) 13:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Ytny (talk) 13:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pointless past compare... Booksworm Talk to me! 17:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ytny's comments and points. Jmlk17 20:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per extensive discussion on WikiProject Football. Punkmorten 11:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above; also, I think that the "current squads" mentioned by Ytny is NOT for current national teams, but, for current club teams. Neier 22:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, current club squads, I meant. Ytny (talk) 04:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - see previous comments here. Daemonic Kangaroo 07:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since the Euro2008 has not still begun. I think the current must apply until the following competition begins. And why not runners-up to not be included. All the others may be can be deleted User:KRBN 20:29 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Strong delete We've already discussed this. CAN 18:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I also nominated

Delete Philc 19:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew_hk t c 12:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - they keep coming. See Template:Netherlands Squad 1912 Olympic games. This is a lost cause. Daemonic Kangaroo 07:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:VoteSmart edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Steve _(Stephen)^talk 03:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an external link template for the Vote Smart Project. Barely in use and not necessary. >Radiant< 11:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with Radiant Flubeca 18:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I created it on the model of {{CongBio}} and {{CongBio2}}. It has not been used, however. Not yet. It could be applied on every current member of U.S. Congress and Senator.—Markles 20:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Yes it could be used, but will it? We shall see. Jmlk17 20:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, man! I'm too lazy to do it myself. I'll try to use it on a dozen or so articles in the next week or so. OK?—Markles 21:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, at your veiled suggestion, I've applied it to a few articles and I encourage you all to join in. Can we keep the template, now?—Markles 13:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Anything to help understand the politicians' stand on issues and voting record is good. As for barely in use, it just means we have to go around and put it on pages. It can be hard to know it exists until we spread it around. A big problem with Wikipedia is the large around of esoteric information that you have to figure out as you go along but it can be worth it. Can we get the "The template below has been proposed for deletion" thing removed? Fanra 02:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Latest stable release/Office.com & Template:Latest preview release/Office.com edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 06:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Associated with article Office.com which was deleted via prod. Templates where not actually used on article and are not really useful even if article wasn't deleted. -- JLaTondre 00:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete useless single use of {{LPR}}. –Pomte 03:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DELETED! This is so stupid as a template....
Delete a useless template; delete it. Jmlk17 20:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pretty useless - then again, so are most of these. Orderinchaos 07:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:InvaderZimWikiProject edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted. –Pomte 20:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template is for a WikiProject which has since been merged as a taskforce for another project. It has been removed from all articles. I suggest a speedy delete. — ●BillPP ^{(talk|contribs)} 00:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As only you have made significant edits to the template, it can be speedy deleted (G7) with {{db-author}}. –Pomte 04:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Country data Rhodes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Steve _(Stephen)^talk 02:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rhodes is just a Greek island, with Greek citizens and the same status as the rest of the islands and mainland Greece. It's not a country but only a greek prefecture! This template was created for some Rhodes football team which was called national without any reason. The included flag is probably fictional as putting any sign on the Flag of Greece is forbidden by law. — geraki 15:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The Rhodes flag is probably OR - couldn't find any at Google Images. Orderinchaos 07:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nonsense. –Pomte 04:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.