Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 January 16

< January 15	January 17 >

January 16 edit

Template:Perp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Cryptic 23:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template to flag articles related to perpetual motion as pseudoscience. It is entirely unnecessary to flag things as pseudoscience. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 23:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Most Wikipedians will agree that this template contains weasel words. We also don't generally use templates to declare articles to be about subjects that a particular group of people disapprove of. What's next? "This article documents an aspect of Microsoft Windows, an operating system that many Linux users disapprove of"? -/- Warren 01:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is OK to delete it, but for a different reason than above. The reason I see is that it isn't used on any article, according to "what links here"; just some talk pages, etc. It has been around for more than a year but hasn't been applied to any articles on perpetual motion machines, except in a talk page. Bubba73 (talk), 02:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC) Added: well it is used on talk pages of two minor articles about perpetual motion machines. Bubba73 (talk), 02:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC) But it is little-used, and the PPM infobox (below) is better and replaces it. Bubba73 (talk), 21:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It used to be more widely used (including in articles), but it was replaced by a somewhat more circumspect (and less visually offensive) PMM infobox: Template:Perpetual motion machine.--ragesoss 02:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - just a disclaimer template by another name ... speaking of which, if this template is kept, it probably needs a new name. "Perp", to most people, refers to a criminal. So the name of this template is rather confusing. --BigDT 21:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and Delete-- Most uses are in evidence Archives // FrankB 20:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:2006/2007 Libyan Premier League Results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Cryptic 23:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only consists of links to deleted articles. -Punkmorten 08:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Elisson • T • C • 17:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Tellyaddict 18:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can't think of any other arguements besides the nom, so...per nom. –Llama man 21:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Danish Superliga 2006-07 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Cryptic 23:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only consists of links to deleted articles. --Punkmorten 08:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as someone has delete every article this links to. ka la ha 08:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. – Elisson • T • C • 17:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per above. Tellyaddict 18:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can't think of any other arguements besides the nom, so...per nom. –Llama man^{sign here} 21:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Corgoň Liga Results - 2007 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Cryptic 23:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only consists of links to deleted articles. --Punkmorten 08:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Elisson • T • C • 17:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. Tellyaddict 18:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I can't think of any other arguements besides the nom, so...per nom. –Llama man 21:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedied, per the recent MFD. >Radiant< 16:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Segway Geeks Recruitment edit

Template:Segway Geeks Recruitment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I also nominate the redirects Wikipedia:Segway Geeks Recruitment, TEMP:SGR, and TP:SGR for deletion. There is no point in keeping this template since the project Segway Geeks is now nonexistent (per discussion at WP:MFD). Moreover, the template is used on only one user talk page. —S .D. ¿п? 01:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Yuser31415 04:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. Tellyaddict 18:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, prpoject does not exist. –Llama man 21:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
can't we speedy this? ~Crazytales (talk) 22:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Speedy deletion should only be done with templates that clearly violate Wikipedia policy. Otherwise, due process is good. :-) -/- Warren 01:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my nomination statement on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Segway Geeks, and per above opinions. --Deskana (request backup) 16:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.