Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 February 16

< February 15	February 17 >

February 16 edit

Template:Infobox Dawson's Creek episode edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 07:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was duplicating {{Infobox Television episode}} all uses have been replaced with that template and the showspecific template is no longer in use now. This is part of a larger effort to remove duplicity in episode infoboxes. --Jay32183 22:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 14:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 00:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:ASOIAFBooks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 07:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These A Song of Ice and Fire templates are no longer used and redundant to Template:ASOIAF. --Pomte 09:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does it qualify for CSD#G6? —Dgies^t c 16:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, although this is housekeeping it is not a move nor are they disambigs. Merging page histories is unnecessary as the content is non-controversial. There are other nominations here for the same reason. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Pomte 16:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template Template:Great Houses from a Song of Ice and Fire is definately redundant Scafloc 17:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No, we'll have to wait. But it'll get deleted, don't worry. Alex43223^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 08:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Isu edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 07:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a redundant template. Template:Isu name is better designed and gives a more logical order to the link (name, then organization, with the first link being the external link). --Kolindigo 04:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It looks to me like there are no references remaining to this template. Dr.frog 12:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- RebSkii 18:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Dallas episode edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 07:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was duplicating {{Infobox Television episode}} all uses have been replaced with that template and the showspecific template is no longer in use now. This is part of a larger effort to remove duplicity in episode infoboxes. -- TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 04:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant and unused. Jay32183 04:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.