August 11 edit

Template:KMEGAnchors edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KMEGAnchors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A massive redlink farm--plus a possible WP:NOT violation.. Blueboy96 19:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Full of redlinks. ~ Wikihermit 19:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, will hardly be used anywhere because the articles it should be placed on don't exist. –sebi 22:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I disagree. If you don't like the red links, remove the brackets. It is a useful template as it lists the anchors of KMEG.

n64ra 18:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IRL C edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IRL C (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template is just a word after I removed the fair use image. It also isn't used in any articles. . ~ Wikihermit 19:06, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, fair use image had to be removed as the template is unused, and without the image it is worthless. Melsaran 20:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, purposeless template. –sebi 22:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NarniaBooks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:03, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NarniaBooks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The template's depreciated (as of April) and no pages use it. — CR7 (message me) 18:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Deprecated edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delist. TFD is not a forum for revoking policy, or for discussing proposed policy. >Radiant< 09:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deprecated (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What is this, a prod for templates? Which deletion policy allows this? — -Nard 15:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Drummer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Drummer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete. Orphaned and redundant with {{Infobox musical artist}}. --PEJL 13:23, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lists of people edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete per housekeeping (G6). Looks like I'm gonna need some help here. Singularity 16:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These templates serve no purpose. 175 of them are orphaned, the rest only have transclusions because they're used in other templates in the group. I've found no evidence that any of them are used in the article namespace, though I could be wrong. --MZMcBride 04:23, 11 August 2007 (UTC) Note: This list was appended and 56 templates were added. --MZMcBride 21:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cult mind control links edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge into {{Cults}}. Mike Peel 09:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cult mind control links (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Redundant. Delete and merge any non duplicated content to {{Cults}} ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge per proposal - the number of articles it is found in (and also the topic of said articles) doesn't warrant its continued existence... Sfacets 03:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, and redirect {{cult mind control links}} to {{cults}}. –sebi 04:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.