Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 April 7

< April 6	April 8 >

April 7 edit

Template:PJ Trailers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy closed - Not a template, vandalism is not a rationale for deletion. 24.4.46.239 00:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

False information has been added to this page. Template is being used to slander corporation by an unregistered user.

Speedy close, this is referring to the article PJ Trailers, not a template. Addition of false unsourced information is not a reason for deleteion. The user adding the false info should be warned with templates like {{uw-unsourced1}}. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 20:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cyrillic alphabet edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was subst and delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 07:40, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to merge this template into the main article (that is Cyrillic alphabet) and then delete this template. This template is too large to be used in other articles. Besides, {{Cyrillic alphabet navbox}} has served a similar purpose. ✉Hello World! 14:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete after subst'ing on to Cyrillic alphabet, the only article that uses it. Too unwieldy to use anywhere else. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 20:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete single-use, inappropriate in any other article and redundant to {{Cyrillic alphabet navbox}}. –Pomte 04:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~To administrators, I suggest merging the edit history of this template to the main article (Cyrillic alphabet) before deleting it. --✉Hello World! 14:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)~~--✉ Hello World![reply]

Uh, no, that would make a mess of the histories, and is not necessary. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 05:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User_Isuzu_Axiom edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. No objections raised and the template should be deleted before the category can be deleted. It is also nominated at CfD and the category should be deleted in a few hours. Vegaswikian 19:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Used by a single user, who is indef blocked. — Nardman1 00:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I was about to say keep pending their appeals running out, but it looks like they've exhausted the community's patience already. On the off chance they get unblocked they can ask for this to be undeleted (and userfied). —dgies^t_c 05:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trolling silliness. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 08:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Since no one using it. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie} 15:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or move it to userspace if the editor ever comes back. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 14:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Disambig-entertainment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Yannismarou 20:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

as above, created by and only used by indef blocked user. Nardman1 01:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Actually used in 2 disambiguation pages. I have no experience on dab templates so I will refrain from commenting on its usefulness. —dgies^t_c 05:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a normal disambig template should work fine. As it stands, having this on a page restricts the articles that can be added to the page to entertainment-related articles only. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 20:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my logic used in the deletion discussion of {{2CC}}. Gracenotes ^T § 04:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It doesn't exactly prevent someone from linking a non-entertainment related article, but that would create ambiguity about when to stop using this template. More useful than acronyms, but not by much. If it is useful for a WikiProject to sort these out, tag the Talk pages. –Pomte 04:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant, pointless, and may actually discourage people from adding otherwise-appropriate links to dab pages. As someone who has created a few dab pages and edited many more, I would never even consider using this. Xtifr _tälk 16:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User TWINKLE edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Yannismarou 20:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

as above, used only by indef blocked user. Nardman1 01:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per my arguments on the car userbox. —dgies^t_c 05:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - trolling silliness, and I think this is redundant anyway. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 08:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Useless WikiMan53 (talk) (click here) 20:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant to but not quite as good as User:UBX/Twinkle and User:UBX/Twinkle2. WODUP 20:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WODUP --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie} 15:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 05:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant, as outlined by WODUP Neil916 (Talk) 17:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.