Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 April 28

< April 27	April 29 >

April 28 edit

Template:Sections of the Lima Metropolitan Area edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Picaroon (Talk) 19:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "Lima" template (template:Lima) already covers all links here.— Andersmusician 23:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redundant. –Pomte 02:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above MJCdetroit 04:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Sakshama edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Picaroon (Talk) 19:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Used in only one article presently nominated for AfD; if the article does survive, this could easily be replaced with the standard corp/org infobox, as this is essentially a duplicate, provides no additional parameters, and no evidence of needing other parameters has been given. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -Phoenix 00:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not in use; soon won't be needed whatsoever. Jmlk17 06:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chrono Cross edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Picaroon (Talk) 19:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted because it's redundant with Template:Chrono series. — Kariteh 14:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Per nominator's point -凶 14:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as nominator. Combination 23:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's redundant. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 00:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. -Phoenix 00:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom. —dima /talk/ 02:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above comments and nomination. Jmlk17 06:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Carlosguitar 21:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chrono Trigger edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was

Should be deleted because it's redundant with Template:Chrono series. — Kariteh 14:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Per Kariteh's point. -凶 14:49, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as nominator. Combination 23:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom. —dima /talk/ 02:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yeah, flat out redundant. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 05:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above comments. Jmlk17 06:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

"The Ultimate Encyclopedia" templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Withdrawn, templates now part of a bigger discussion at MfD here. VegaDark 02:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All of these templates were apparently created for use on another Wiki. This should therefore be on that Wiki, not here. All should be deleted or at least userfied. VegaDark 02:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.