July 27, 2006

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 05:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox VT Route (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Functionality has been incorporated into {{Infobox road}}. Should be deleted. TMF T - C 22:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

SCOTUS Templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deletion of all. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 05:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SCOTUSCase2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSRecentCase (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSOpinionStart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSMajority (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSJoin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSConcurrence (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:CourtConcurrence (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSDissent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:CourtDissent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSOpinionEnd (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:CourtOpinionEnd (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSConcurrence/Dissent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSPlurality (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:CourtPlurality (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUSOverruled (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:CourtOverruled (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1789-1792 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1946-1949 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1930 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1932-1937 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1925-1930 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1923-1925 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1937-1938 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1941-1942 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1792-1793 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1793-1795 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1795 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1796-1798 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1798-1799a (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1801-1804 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:United States Court Case (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:United States Supreme Court Case (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1975-1981 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1981-1986 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1804-1806 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1807-1810 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1810-1811 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1811-1812 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1812-1823 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1823-1826 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1826-1828 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1828-1829 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1891-1892 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1953-1954 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1962-1965 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1967-1969 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1970-1971 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1994-2005 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 2005-2006 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 2006 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1993-1994 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1991-1993 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1990-1991 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1988-1990 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1930-1932 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1903-1906 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1969 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:SCOTUS 1972-1975 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

These templates are all obsolete now, after the creation and implementation of Template:SCOTUSCase. These templates were used to create Supreme Court case infoboxes, but each of them is no longer necessary using the newly created template with its ParserFunctions. A few of the links are redirects, but I'm strongly in favor of deleting all of these, instead of using redirects, so that there can be uniformity among all the U.S. Supreme Court cases. The templates that are currently redirects are double indented, and I'm asking that the redirect pages be deleted. MZMcBride 19:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --Ssbohio 20:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Someone called my attention to this proposal. I think some of the templates being proposed for deletion were ones I created for the simple reason there wasn't a single, good template to provide all the information. If the one template does do the job correctly for all years, it's a great idea, and in such a case I agree on deleting the redundant templates, provided all of the pages that use them have been revised to remove their usage, as we do not want broken pages. If this has been done, I have no objections and am glad to see a good fix done. Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) 03:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is essentially housekeeping. Thanks so much, Paul, for making these templates. They worked well when we used them.--Chaser T 23:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep, hoping for an article to be created. RyanGerbil10(The people rejoice!) 05:29, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FullHouseFamilyTree (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wholly unencyclopedic crufty OR template, not actually transcluded anywhere. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 20:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources can be provided if it is moved to the article space. Sources are from the episodes. -AMK152 17:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Closing early; consensus is already clear and the template with deletion text is making many pages ugly. kingboyk 17:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Just puts the featured article star picture in with a specific size and alternate text. However, it should be substituted where it exists (in non-article spaces) and then deleted because it lends itself to misuse. Many editors confuse it with template:featured article, as evidence by the comments on the template talk and the fact that today I found it inserted at the beginning of two featured articles (who knows how many times it has been inappropriately deployed in the past). It also lends itself to marking featured articles in lists in the article space, which there is no consensus for (imagine if we used the FA star next to every link to a featured article). If it is kept for use in the non-article space, it should be moved to a substantially less prominent name to avoid further confusion. savidan(talk) (e@) 07:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, change the name. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 08:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

subst and keep, maybe we should start substing it from this point on, but still keep it for future use —Minun Spiderman 10:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

change my vote to Delete, with Image:LinkFA-star.png ( ), this template is redundant. Dafoeberezin3494 16:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by User:Edgar181 per author request on an unused template. - Bobet 23:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footer Olympic Champions 18km Cross Country Men (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Combined with Template:Footer Olympic Champions 15 km Cross Country Men. Speedy delete requested by template author (myself). Chris 12:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete, author request on an unused template. - Bobet 23:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Footer_Olympic_Champions_20km_XC_Women (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Short Champions box. This was combined with the Template:Footer Olympic Champions 30km XC Women. Speedy delete requested per author (myself). Chris 13:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Author request.Chris 13:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.