January 10 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 02:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Protected Area Table edit

Template:Protected Area Table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete template, subtemplates, and associated talk pages — Obsolete; this template (along with its associated subtemplates listed below) has been superceded by Template:Infobox protected area. — Eoghanacht talk 21:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of subtemplates:
  • Delete all these are now obsolete and I do not believe they are used anywhere in this wiki.--MONGO 03:59, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - let them clean after themselves ;) Renata 16:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not used DaGizzaChat (c) 11:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Loopy e 21:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 02:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:State park edit

Template:State park (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete template and talk page — Obsolete template, supplanted by the more general Template:Infobox protected area. — Eoghanacht talk 18:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as per above. --Kralizec! 23:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete ditto --DaGizza Chat 02:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This template is now obsolete.--MONGO 04:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. In with the new, out with the old.Voice of AllT|@|ESP 04:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete — per CSD G7 and vote of Kralizec! above. AzaToth 14:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Loopy e 21:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 05:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NihonG edit

Template:NihonG (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Speedy delete — Unlinked template. 2 edits. Replaced by, perhaps, Template:Politics of Japan. —Philip N. 21:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, obsolete template. - Bobet 02:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Loopy e 21:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, already substed. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 05:40, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of Salt Lake City neighborhoods edit

Template:List of Salt Lake City neighborhoods (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete — This template is only in use by one article, Salt Lake City, Utah. I wish to convert the entire article to prose, but I don't want to change that part until this template is deleted. I believe I can describe it much more informatively on prose. In addition, all of these neighborhoods are already listed on Template:Salt Lake City. bob rulz 04:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as per nom, unused. *\o/* Dustimagic *\o/* 04:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete, there will be minimal consequence from doing so as the templete is only present in one article and it can easily be copied and pasted. — Seven Days » talk 05:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete after converting into article text, if needed. -- nae'blis (talk) 16:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, Delete. Seems pretty much useless in one article.The Scurvy Eye 22:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Niffweed17 20:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Loopy e 21:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I have substed the template into the relevant article. Can be safely deleted now. —gorgan_almighty 15:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.