Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 March 21
March 21
edit
- watermarked image claimed as "self" SkierRMH (talk) 00:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- delete self request.[I'm the uploader of this image] - MCM19 (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- apparent screenshot(?) claimed as self SkierRMH (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, the article of the subject of the photo was deleted for lack of notability. BlueAzure (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- OR, unused, apparent publicity shot SkierRMH (talk) 03:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- - uploaded by YasirSaklaneAli (notify | contribs).
- OR, unused/unusable SkierRMH (talk) 03:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- OR, probable publicity shot SkierRMH (talk) 03:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- apparent screenshot or news photo claimed as 'self' SkierRMH (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- apparently older publicity pic claimed as 'self' SkierRMH (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- painting (publicity?) claimed as 'self' SkierRMH (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- possible film poster claimed as 'self', user has history of altering images such as this, so no way to tell if this is the original or not (original anyone?) SkierRMH (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- same as immediately above SkierRMH (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- same as above (n.b. this is an example of a photoshopped poster) SkierRMH (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- same as above SkierRMH (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Fails WP:NFCC#1 (replaceability). I think that all US soldiers have their picture taken by the US Government, which would mean that public domain photos of all these soldiers could be found. Failing that, all of these soldiers are still living, so photos could still be taken of them. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep However this instance of the US soldiers can't be found in the public domain. And the article is about when they're taken as POWs -- Esemono (talk) 04:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Absent uploader w/history of incorrect (c) tags, no proof that uploader is photographer or photographed SkierRMH (talk) 05:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned - there doesn't seem to be a corresponding article in which it could be used. If it's a screenshot, the GFDL license is suspect. Black Falcon (Talk) 06:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Image is copyvio found on the web at http://azizisbored.com/ Seidenstud (talk) 09:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- This is the logo of Warid Telecom though editor who uploaded it claimed it as his own work. I strongly suggest him to change licensing information otherwise it will be a violation of copyright. Moreover, to keep this image on Wikipedia, he can add a Fair Use Rationale. Cheers! -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 09:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
6 7 Images uploaded by Sverdrup
edit
Image:Mandarin-glyph-sverdrup.png
Image:Bowtie-red.jpg
Image:Set-union.png
Image:Set-intersection.png
Image:Set-xor.png
Image:LorenzAttractor.png
Unused old images all created and uploaded by me under GFDL license. All are redundant, unused or superceded by proper vector graphics. I'm not even sure I have to ask for this but I'll do it and wait 5 days, then delete the bunch. Gallery of the images available at User:Sverdrup/Images#clean_out -- Sverdrup (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Forgot this one: Image:F*uck!.png. Utterly unuseful. -- Sverdrup (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Deleted. It appears one of the images was both here and on commons, something I didn't notice before I deleted it here. No damage (what so ever) done. -- Sverdrup (talk) 01:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- - uploaded by King of Hearts (notify | contribs).
- Fails WP:NFCC criterion 1. Images such as this one from Commons (already in use in the article) Image:National museum of China 2008 countdown clock.jpg can show exactly the same subject matter and be under a free lisence (I believe under freedom of panorama Guest9999 (talk) 17:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. The editorial use of logos, to cover the subject of the logo, is a textbook case of fair use. The logo itself is not replaceable with a photo of the logo on a building. We don't replace good logos with photos that happen to include the logo. Rhobite (talk) 23:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep — there are hundreds, if not thousands, of logo images (tagged with
{{non-free logo}}) for which fair-use is appropriate, so this is clearly a standard practice. Rhobite sums it up nicely. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 23:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC) - Keep. Per reasons above. Briefly, this is the logo. Other images containing it aren't. It would not make sense to switch. Jared (t) 12:43, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Image:National museum of China 2008 countdown clock.jpg will distort the logo and thus misrepresent the event it is trying to portray. Non-free logos are necessary in these cases. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned image. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Homeendnumlock (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation, a screenshot from a computer game cannot be released {{PD-self}}. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Thengathalayan (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. I found it at Wikipedia:Images with missing articles/In the public domain by age, for which it clearly does not qualify (being a logo of a modern-day company). RFBailey (talk) 22:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Changed this image to a bigger and cleaner version of same historical portrait from Commons GreyCat (talk) 23:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
