Duplicate. The same image is available at Wikimedia Commons, (http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Tenrikyo_emblem.svg). The image at Commons has more informations and was edited to fit its size. Probably the user wanted to update the image at Wikipedia, but was not able to do so because of the lack of permission to overwrite it.
Wouldn't it have been better to tag this image no rationale? (And probably fair use reduce.) This image could be used on an article about the single if it met the previously stated requirements.↔NMajdan•talk14:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It couldn't be used "on an article about the single" because we still don't have verifiable information confirming this is gonna be the single's cover. This is more likely a fan-made cover and, as such, has no encyclopedic value. --Abu badali(talk)03:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tagging it as not having a fair use rationale implies that adding one means the image should be kept. That's not the problem; the problem is that it comes from an unreliable source and is likely a fan-made cover (if the music video features the two artists equally, it's unlikely that only one will appear on the cover). ShadowHalo04:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Almost certainly a hoax. It was made in photoshop, according to the meta-data, has no source information, and edits relating to this picture are the only edits of its uploader. Was made to mimic the cover of Bela Lugosi's Dead. — J Milburn22:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If it were real, which it's certainly not, it would have been posted on the official website. Marilyn Manson probably wouldn't even show the public before it's release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.237.190.61 (talk • contribs)
