January 14

edit
Uploaded by Helpfulimageposter (notify | contribs). I uploaded this image but now have decided there is no good use for it — Helpfulimageposter 01:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Toytoy (notify | contribs). May be illicit child pornography, as per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive173#Underage images posted to Erection: "...it is unlawful to posess a naked and sexually explicit picture of a person under 18 years of age." Nominated on December 26 by User:Yazov, who didn't post the nomination here. — tyomitch 01:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I am unsure of how in any way this image would be considered "sexually explicit". The image is used in two appropirate places. I do not think the above linked discussion is at all comparable to this image. A quick question to User:Tyomitch, is this a procedural nomination or a support of deletion.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is not a support of deletion, but rather bringing attention to a touchy subject. I know none of this legal matter myself, so I abstain. --tyomitch 15:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Candlewicke (notify | contribs). Removed from article Titanic (1997 film). Low quality screenshot of minor character. No source. No fair use rationale. Nv8200p talk 01:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Possible delete - Image is very unclear and would need some major work on it or would probably need to be deleted. Tellyaddict
Uploaded by Chuckicks (notify | contribs). "Used by permission", but no specific permission specified. Conflicting tags, Absentee uploader Nv8200p talk 04:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Comradeqsp (notify | contribs). orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Possible delete - This Image is really unclear and an image with the persons full head would be better and clearer and more suitable for a Wiki article.
Uploaded by Candlewicke (notify | contribs). Low quality screenshot. Obsolete by Image:Dicaprio winslet titanic.jpg in article Titanic (1997 film) Nv8200p talk 02:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Comradeqsp (notify | contribs). orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Sanal g (notify | contribs). Doesn't appear to be selfcreated. Not used anywhere. Uploader absent. Fred-Chess 02:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Vacuousabyss (notify | contribs). orphaned image, sole contribution of user, personal photo Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Mrmullet (notify | contribs). orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 02:49, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Fcbayern55 (notify | contribs). Unencyclopedic. Vanity; the only page using this image has been deleted. — Carson 04:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Houdini8749 (notify | contribs). OB Image:CU AF Insignia1961.svg, of questionable licensing, only used on Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve BigDT 03:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Senix (notify | contribs). This image is not used and is very similar to Image:Amestris Military Government.gifRemember the dot (t) 04:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Ejensen1 (notify | contribs). This image, even though it is licensed under the GFDL, is a picture of box art and would therefore fall under fair use. Since it is not used in any articles and its claim of GFDL licensing is questionable, this image should be deleted. —Remember the dot (t)
Uploaded by Irongargoyle (notify | contribs). OR, OB: Image:3deadmal2.jpg - obsoleted by Image:Deadmalls dot com screenshot.jpg. — SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Gethomas3 (notify | contribs). Unnecessary unfree image. Used only for casual illustration in 1966_FIFA_World_CupSuperm401 - Talk 08:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know about unnecessary — several World Cup articles detail the selection of that year's mascot, and an image of the subject at hand is an important illustrative part of that. No comment on whether it is free, fair use, or something else (I'm not familiar enough with copyright tags to know what it falls under), but I would prefer to keep this image if at all possible. Tijuana Brass 10:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by David.Monniaux (notify | contribs). Used under fair use but no rationale provided, Image uploaded prior to May 4, 2006 so not elgible for CSD I6 MECUtalk 17:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting because there is now a rationale. Superm401 - Talk 08:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Gerardgarcia (notify | contribs). Unencyclopedic personal photo, orphaned. — Flyingtoaster1337 10:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by PAR (notify | contribs). Violation of WP:FUC criterions 1, 2, 3, 8 and WP:IUP#Photo_montages. See Talk:Standard test image. — Oden 14:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The same applies for:

Uploaded by Glen Conway (notify | contribs). OR, UE- — pd_THOR | =/\= | 16:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Glen Conway (notify | contribs). OR, UE- — pd_THOR | =/\= | 16:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Davidlloydrocks (notify | contribs). OR, UE, NEW, possible attack image MECUtalk 18:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Shakirashakira92 (notify | contribs). UE, LQ, low and poor quality makes it UE MECUtalk 18:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Djfreshie (notify | contribs). OR, UE, first contrib by new user MECUtalk 19:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by MADREX2001 (notify | contribs). OR, UE, usd in CSD article MECUtalk 19:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Factually inaccurate. Uploader has been notified; image is factually inaccurate and shouldn't be on WP is no one is going to fix it. JARED(t)19:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Claim is made that it is for fair use. But, not being used for Comment/Criticism of the artwork, or for parody of the artwork. Atom 20:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete I'd love to see the image stay. I think it's great art with an emotional power. However, the fact that I like it doesn't eliminate the fair use problem. The fact that I think the current interpretation of fair use is unnecessarily restrictive is, likewise, not relevant. The only thing that matters is that this image is not being used in a manner consistent with fair use policy. Because of that, deleteion is warranted, unless the image's use is improved to comply with fair use. --Ssbohio 04:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Mtbrocket (notify | contribs). Reasons: AB, LQ, OB This picture was in the article Fraser Island but I replaced it with a much better picture from commons. The picture is very low quality and now obsolete for any article. Bobo is soft 08:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Bookish (notify | contribs). Violates the WP:NOR policy (see talk page) — Ubarfay 11:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I am relisting this image from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 January 6 without prejudice. Notification was not given and it is in wide use. --BigDT 20:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • One other comment - I have no particular preference whether the image is kept or not, but if it is, we can ask Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve to produce an SVG version of it. --BigDT 21:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep. The image is useful and percentages are only slightly out. This is probably as a result of rounding up. However the image does need to be improved so that the percentages are exactly correct. Nicolharper 15:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep. I am of the opinion that the pie should be retained. I'm not sure it violates the WP:NOR policy- a verifiable source should be possible to find if we look hard enough. However, unless we find a good source that can verify the exact percentages, the numbers should probably be removed so the pie just gives an overall idea. And yes, I think this badly needs an SVG convert. --ram_einstein 13:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete. The percentages are the issue in dispute. Other Reliable Sources put Christianity at no more than 22% of the adult world population, meaning <15% of the total population. The French version of the Religion page gives numbers and therefore proportions statistically significantly different than the English page. This graphic violates the WP:NOR policy criterion:

"[...]synthesis of established [...] opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source"

Granted, the act of synthesis is merely applying a spreadsheet graphing function on data from a source accepted as reliable. But, that source is not here attributed. And, to repeat, this same WP:NOR policy has been used to remove tabulations of data available from other sources that yield a dramatically different profile of world religiosity and Christianity. The WP:RS guideline requires neutrality on matters of religion. Either we allow graphical visualizations of multiple reliable sources, or we allow none. To permit only one source to be visualized is a flagrant violation of WP:NPOV. --Ubarfay 08:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not deleted - no consensus to delete. I would suggest, though, as a possible compromise, that it may be worthwhile to simply update the image. A mutually agreeable source like the world almanac or something could be used to obtain up-to-date percentages and then a request can be made to Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve to create an image in the likeness of this one with the current/correct percentages. --BigDT 02:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dudesleeper (notify | contribs). Unencyclopedic. — Computerjoe's talk 21:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Grandswiss (notify | contribs). Obsolete: superseded by vector Image:Motherboards form factors.svg