Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 May 31

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 May 31)

May 31 edit

Uploaded by Vinhmelb (notify). Listed on 2006 May 17, but uploader not notified. Original reason was: CV. see[1], "Copyright by Press and Information Department " --howcheng {chat} 23:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Paranoid (notify). CV, OR: Source URL is no longer available, however in my view a modification of a modification of a copyright image still falls under copyright (original image copyright to GONZO, GOTT, gimík, FUNimation etc.) hence image falls under fair use and, since it is not currently used on any articles in the main namespace, is eligible for deletion. —Shiroi Hane 01:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' Per above FunkyChicken! 22:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by User talk:Michaellam (notify) and User talk:ChessAndCookies (notify). AB, OR: Is not part of David Quinn (actor) because many users seem to not want it on the article. No page currently uses the image, and both uploading users seem to have left Wikipedia. I would argue it should be in the article, but after a very long revert war, I think it's better deleted. —Sonic3KMaster(鉄也)(talk) 03:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly was the rationale for removing the picture? Keep unless clarified. - Mike Rosoft 11:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The rationale to remove the picture was that some people didnt like it because that's not what he looks like anymore. Sonic3KMaster(鉄也)(talk) 22:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It looks as if it was a pawn in a wicked revert war - one of the things that is going to discredit Wikipedia if things like that don't stop. FunkyChicken! 22:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There is no reason to fight over such silly things. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The UW claims ownership of this image in their newsletter and website policies. Immediate deletion.
Keep Things will eventually sort themselves out Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Result: Keep. However, as a fair use image not being used anywhere, it's now marked for speedy deletion. howcheng {chat} 18:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by H. merkin (notify). CV, image is labeled as a publicity photo but is in fact copyrighted property of the Denver Post ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 07:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination. FunkyChicken! 22:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I uploaded these files and am waiting for the Ho Shin Do article to be approved for undelete. Please keep them because I intend on using them again. Frankiefuller 08:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)frankiefuller[reply]
  • Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Tramster (notify). The sole purpose of this image is to harrass other users and vandalize their talk pages. —cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Husnock (notify). Replaced by better SVG- 80.63.213.182 14:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As User:Husnock isnt available for comment as stated on his User and talk pages(Deployed with US forces in Iraq}. The image isnt infringing copyright suggest that the image be retained until the Uploader is available to comment. Gnangarra 15:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep until uploader can comment. Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Oceanbeach (notify). Relisting this from May 18 as uploader was not notified per policy. Original reason: OR photo of a user who made one edit in February. howcheng {chat} 16:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Joeclan (notify). Relisting this from May 18 as uploader was not notified per policy. Original reason: OR, UE, plain silly. howcheng {chat} 16:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Thetooflepope (notify). Relisting this from May 18 as uploader was not notified per policy. Original reason: UE, for userpage of a user with four edits, all vandalism. howcheng {chat} 16:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Edandlondie (notify). Relisting this from May 18 as uploader was not notified per policy. Original reason: OR, UE, no source or description. howcheng {chat} 16:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Darkmoon500 (notify). Relisting this from May 18 as uploader was not notified per policy. Original reason: OR, unknown subject, likely UE. howcheng {chat} 16:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Sporting7 (notify). CV. This image is from Getty Images. howcheng {chat} 16:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination. FunkyChicken! 22:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: NO USE! It doesn't work. Delete per nom. Häsk 16:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination. ~~
Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should be at WP:IfD. —CuiviénenT|C|@ on Wednesday, 31 May 2006 at 16:29 UTC


Reason: NO USE! It doesn't work. Delete per nom. Häsk 16:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination. ~~
Delete for the same reasons as in the nomination. Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, it is a doctored photo of television program that makes fun of a newsman for using a stage name, a very common occurance. This photo came from a message board as a result over an argument over Jim Gardner's stage name. Also take a look at the caption... "Action News" is not a spoof and Goldman is not an actor portraying Gardner. Delete per nom. capsgm2002 20:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It does not look like a doctored photo. If it is please provide the original. I think someone is being a bit paranoid over the vandalism issue. MilesToGo 18:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep My cousin works at WABC and they decided to have a little fun with the graphic as a practical joke on the WPVI people when covering a New Jersey governor's debate. Apparently there was a wager involved and there is a corresponding joke lower third that appeared on WPVI when Diana Williams was on screen which said "Lady Diana" under "Diana Williams" which aired on another broadcast. Such is the world of televison! UncleFloyd 18:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The above story is true, I heard it from several of my contacts there and actually saw the video of it. There is a bit of rivalry between the various o&o stations in New York and Philadelphia. TVXPert19:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Saw said graphic on WABC after going through footage borrowed from the station. WWACArtist
The three above posters are sock puppets of each other. The story IS NOT true and this is a doctored photo. I have watched the program where this came "screenshot" came from and not once did this graphic show up. Secondly, I don't think these stations have a rivalry, they're in different towns, share resources at times, and are owned by the same company. Third, these three usernames are attributed to the fake WWAC-DT article. capsgm2002 08:37 01 Jun 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep The image looks legitimate, however the story given above seems a bit dubious. When people start with the sockpuppet argument it is most likely a bunch of teenagers with too much time on their hands. Go outside and play and leave this to adults! Don't make us have to go tell your mother! FunkyChicken! 22:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Photo is image taken from televison show on WABC channel 7. Please Keep image. I thank you for you cooperation in the matter. With love. KingsCountyToasterAssociation 22:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Non offensive, maybe not fake. Possible nomination out of spite or some sort of battle among children. Assume good faith! Nertz 19:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC) User registered on June 2[reply]
  • Keep I have fallen onto the article about James Goldman (actor) and see that the photograph from the video is a needed part of the article. This photograph should remain. Is the voting being done for reasons of not being good to others? ShigeruNomi 16:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC)User registered on June 3[reply]
    • No, Mr. Sockpuppet, because it's a phony being used to prop up a juvenile prank. --Calton | Talk 00:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Phony image used to prop up a juvenile prank. --Calton | Talk 00:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and agree with capsgm2002. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWAC-TV. Olessi 14:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks like part of a massive running edit war between a group of rival television editors. Edit wars are bad. Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Stoyve (notify). Relisting from May 20 as uploader was not notified. Original reason: OR, AB. howcheng {chat} 17:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Kalaha (notify). The image is not needed —kalaha 19:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nomination. ~~
Uploaded by Nathanlarson32767 (notify). (AB) Source page says that only "photographs identified as our original work are free to the world for any use you see fit," but this photograph is not identified as such and therefore is most likely NOT public domain or copyrighted-free-use. howcheng {chat} 19:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Guanaco (notify). Redundant to commons image of the same name.- Rory096 20:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by LBOscar (notify). Relisting this from May 21 as uploader was not notified. Original reason: OR. howcheng {chat} 20:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded by KlausFr (notify). Obsoleted by Image:Tianeptine.png. —Bkell (talk) 21:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Ltljltlj (notify). Obsoleted by Image:Alabama 21.svg. —Bkell (talk) 21:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Zscout370 (notify). Redundant to Image:Armed forces red triangle.svg. —Bkell (talk) 21:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above.
Delete Per nom Toasthaven2 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2006_May_31&oldid=1142600178"