Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 July 24

July 24

Image:Obeliks10.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Aynali (notify). OR- BigDT 00:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Austinmosque2.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by JuanMuslim (notify). OR, UE- BigDT 01:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Latinomuslims1.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by JuanMuslim (notify). UE, OR, probably a CV- BigDT 01:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pashield.png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Myselfalso (notify). Orphaned, obsoleted by Image:PA-blank2di.svg. TMF ^{T - C} 02:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pashield.PNG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Myselfalso (notify). Orphaned, obsoleted by Image:PA-blank3di.svg. This is a different image than the above entry (Pashield.png), despite the nearly identical file name. TMF ^{T - C} 02:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PA 73.gif (talk | delete)

Uploaded by VerruckteDan (notify). Orphaned, made obsolete by Image:PA-73.svg. TMF ^{T - C} 02:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Agfa MSC 101 Digital.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Danka29 (notify). OR, UE, AU- BigDT 04:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:QSS 3011.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Danka29 (notify). OR, UE, AU- BigDT 04:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Liekomgz.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by BxMANxP (notify). UE, vanity, also listed the article this was on for Speedy A7 -Royalguard11^Talk 04:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wik.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by The Man (notify). OR, AU, UE - nay the very definition of UE- BigDT 05:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wik aurora1.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Atrahasis (notify). OR, AU, of questionable encyclopedic value, copyright notice makes it unlikely to be used in its current state. They are very nice renderings of starships, but WP is not a collection of images. Would Commons be interested? - BigDT 05:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Userbar-Kittens.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by W3bbo (notify). OR, UE, almost certainly a derivative of a copyrighted image- BigDT 05:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The kitten background is a common stock image [1], which I think is free for any use (see also Every time you masturbate… God kills a kitten). The addition of the text might be copyrightable though, and the image is unencyclopedic in any case. —Bkell (talk) 19:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Common use does not eradicate copyright protection. We would still need a source and a license for the background. Kotepho 19:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I'm just trying to help elucidate the copyright status of this image. I thought I read somewhere once that this particular kitten image was freely usable, but I thought it was in Every time you masturbate… God kills a kitten, and the article doesn't seem to say that exactly. —Bkell (talk) 21:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cal_logo2.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Matthew Low (notify). Duplicate of Cal-logo2.jpg. 11:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Listed for speedy deletion. —Bkell (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Two Guys in front of Half Dome.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Mee Ronn (notify). Unjustifiable fair use, I think- Stifle (talk) 12:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sophocles bust.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by User:Neutrality (notify). No source. Tagged PD-art but it is a reproduction of a 3D object, so Bridgeman can't apply. Bibi Saint-Pol 14:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aristophanes.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Egoff (notify). Same as above. Bibi Saint-Pol 16:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aristophanes birds.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Ravenous (notify). Same as above.Bibi Saint-Pol 16:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cute.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by User:KittenHuffer (notify). Only used for blatant vandalism, not used anywhere else. A similar image was once deleted, so bin it. --Richard0612 14:42, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Four Modes of Suppy.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Istia (notify). After talking with the user, she does not allow use of this image in the public domain, which is the existing tag. [2] In addition, since it's an image of a table, someone has already replaced the image with an actual table. Therefore, CV, OB by tables, and OR. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 15:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following images. Uploaded under fair use, but we have free alternatives already. Mark83 17:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Fernando Alonso 650 22 p.jpg
Image:Fernando alonso.jpg
Image:Michael jordan 7.jpg
Image:Purple kangaroo.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Nintendonien (notify). Orphan, taken straight from a copyrighted magazine (as can be seen from the source link), {{NoRightsReserved}} tag almost certainly false. —Bkell (talk) 17:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Image:Continuum-jmcover.jpg (talk | delete)~~

~~Uploaded by Lincalinca (notify). Clearly not an album cover.- Esprit15d 17:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)~~ Photo replaced with acutal album cover. Removing request.--Esprit15d 18:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Supertapir.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Electrified mocha chinchilla (notify). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —Bkell (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sportivnaya metro station.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Paranoid (notify). OR, OB by http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Sportivnaya_metro_station.jpg- — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 17:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- My own image. Paranoid 17:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted from July 17 (uploader not notified): Image:Python batteries included.jpg - Only used in Python Programming Language and there it is only used as a form of humour and is not relevant to the topic. --FlareNUKE 00:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This image wasn't made by a Wikipedian for decorative purposes; it appears (at least, used to appear) on the official Python website to illustrate the "batteries included" philosophy. The image is therefore, when used in the Wikipedia article, an informative illustration of Python culture and the language's branding. Fredrik Johansson 19:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it is decorative, but it is a free image, so there are no problems with decorative images. BigDT 21:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As Fredrik Johansson said. It's firmly associated with Python's "batteries included" philosophy to me, and probably many other Python users. --Piet Delport 06:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Agree that this is illustrative of the "batteries included" philosophy. -- DavidHopwood 03:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Adds nothing to the article. --Kamek 10:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted. howch e ng {chat} 16:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hamilton County Courthouse, Aurora, Nebraska Bkell.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Bkell (notify). My own photograph, now uploaded to the Commons at commons:Image:Hamilton County courthouse, Aurora, Nebraska, USA.jpg. This non-Commons version has been orphaned. —Bkell (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PC Mod.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Nintendonien (notify). CV from [3] - uploader tagged as {{NoRightsReserved}} when uploading it and an anon removed the tag. There is no evidence that the copyright holder has released their rights and as this is probably an AU, there is nobody to answer questions.- BigDT 22:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wertyuiop.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Machtslaus (notify). UE, OR, AU- BigDT 00:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wertyuiopriit.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Machtslaus (notify). UE, OR, AU- BigDT 00:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Agost0001.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Machtslaus (notify). OR, AU, duplicates Image:Agost0002.jpg, differing only by touchups- BigDT 00:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Agost0004.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Machtslaus (notify). OR, AU- BigDT 00:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Agost0007.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Machtslaus (notify). OR, AU- BigDT 00:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- The above five submissions are all from the same author. These are either unencyclopedic (the first two), essentially a duplicate (#3), or ophaned and lack context to explain what it is (4, 5) BigDT 00:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]