Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Video game consoles (seventh generation)/archive1

Video game consoles (seventh generation) edit

Video game consoles (seventh generation)

6 articles

I'm nominating this for removal because I don't think having 2 FAs out of a possible 6 is enough. I also don't think having 2 delisted articles is enough for it to stay, looking at other featured topics. ~~Also please delete this.~~ Spiderone 08:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Premature - I'm sure it will be back here when its time expires, but according to Wikipedia:Featured topic criteria, this topic has until October 15 to re-GA/FA Nintendo DS, and until November 24 to re-GA/FA PSP. 2 FA's out of 6 is also 1/3, which is the minimum required to be a featured topic- and even if it did not meet that, it would fall to Good Topic immediately. This nomination should be speedy removed, as none of the stated reasons are valid (yet). --Pres N 17:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I agree with PresN, but I think it would be simplest to hide this nomination for the timebeing, then either re-bring it come October, or close it as keep if the DS is brought up to standard - rst20xx (talk) 19:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and close: What if the articles get brought back up to GA before the deadline, then this nom will just kind hang there? In all honesty, that's probably an unlikely scenario, but no reason to keep the nom open in my opinion. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Withdraw I guess I'll have to wait. I just thought it was strange to have a featured topic with two articles that aren't good or featured. Spiderone 15:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - to be clear, I hid this nomination when I wrote my above comment, so it can be considered on hold for the timebeing - rst20xx (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restarting - as Nintendo DS needs to be GA by tomorrow, and no progress has been made towards this goal - rst20xx (talk) 11:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. The earlier nomination at least means people knew this needed work. Not done yet, and looks very unlikely to be done in a reasonable time-frame, so should be delisted.Yob Mod 10:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delist - the existence of this nomination should have motivated those who maintain the topic to begin work on the articles before the retention period ended. I see no evidence of any work being done to merit this topic being retained. -MBK₀₀₄ 05:39, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to demote - I think this topic might have comprehensiveness concerns now as well, with articles on new versions of the DS/PSP missing, but that doesn't matter because this topic gets demoted anyway - rst20xx (talk) 14:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]