Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Halloween film series/archive1

Main page	Articles
Halloween (film series)	Halloween (film) - Halloween II - Halloween III: Season of the Witch

I would like this topic to be removed, because Halloween (film series) is not a GA and the topic does have an obvious gap with the rest of the films missing. --Maitch 13:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove - I was about to nominate this myself. It's missing five movies, which makes an obvious gap in the topic. The missing movies are all start-class, so they are ineligible to be added to the topic. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 18:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Same here, was about to nominate. Circeus 18:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per the gap. Hurricanehink (talk) 04:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per gap and dubious quality of main article.Circeus 18:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It COULD be kept if it was refactored as "Halloween original trilogy" series, and if the main article was improved, though.Circeus 18:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't know if "original trilogy" would work with this. It would be an artificial title given to the first three films that (as far as I know) none of the people involved in the films actually used themselves. Dmoon1 18:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Is there any special about the first three movies that would let them be their own topic without the rest of the series? --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 23:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - How about the fact that John Carpenter was involved with those three?--Rmky87 00:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - I don't know if "Halloween films by John Carpenter" is a clear enough topic to pass critiria #1. It seems a bit arbitrary. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 01:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove It's a shame it has to be removed, but the film articles from 4 onwards aren't that wonderful. It'd be great if DMoon1 wished to work on the other Halloween films sometime in the future - he did a splendid job on the first three. LuciferMorgan 10:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Remove obvious gap in topic, missing articles not at least GA. Jay32183 06:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Removal passed - --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 19:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]