Nuclear weapons
 
Nuclear weapons history
Nuclear warfare
Nuclear arms race
Nuclear weapon design
Nuclear explosion
Nuclear testing
Nuclear delivery
Nuclear proliferation
Nuclear countries

The nuclear weapons series is simply the best one I know of on Wikipedia. Category:Nuclear weapons has nearly a hundred articles and several subcategories, but there is also a clear and superb core, represented by the template User:Fastfission designed. The most important articles beyond the template are generally linked as main subarticles from sections, and many of them are quite substantial as well.

Nominate and support--ragesoss 19:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose
    • At least three articles have no references whatsoever. Inline citations would be even better.
    • Several display serious layout issues, notably Nuclear warfare.
    • One is proteced, and one has a merger issue pending.
    • Also obviously not peer reviewed (when doing so, make sure to mention your aim is not FA, though)

Circeus 20:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional support. Get a least three references for each article. Once that's done you can change my vote to support.--HereToHelp 18:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Circeus. Some of the articles completely lack reference. Other objections raised are also serious. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 08:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]