Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/German Type UB I submarines/archive2

< Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/German Type UB I submarines/archive2)

German Type UB I submarines edit

edit | discuss
  German Type UB I submarine
22 articles
 
  SM UB-2
  SM UB-3
  SM UB-4
  SM UB-5
  SM UB-6
  SM UB-7
  SM UB-8
  SM UB-9
  SM UB-10
  SM UB-11
  SM UB-12
  SM UB-13
  SM UB-14
  SM UB-16
  SM UB-17
  Austro-Hungarian U-10 class
  SM U-10 (ex-UB-1)
  SM U-11 (ex-UB-15)
  SM U-15
  SM U-16
  SM U-17
Main contribuitor: Bellhalla

He has suddenly stopped editing two months ago and I have left a notification on his talkpage about a month ago. This might be one of the last contributions that Bellhalla has given to Wikipedia. Nergaal (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I believe the subtopic should be separated because it has 5+1 article by itself and because I plan on nominating a super-topic on Austro-Hungarian classes or submarine list which would need the U-10 class as a subtopic by itself. Nergaal (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I disagree as I do not think the topics are big enough to merit splitting. I definitely think that SM U-10 (Austria-Hungary) (the only one of the 5 not a GA but at GAN) and SM U-11 (Austria-Hungary), in particular, should be part of this topic, as they were originally used by the German navy, and were only later sold to Austria-Hungary (while the other three boats in the U-10 class were built for and used from the start by Austria-Hungary). Also I don't think your plans to nominate a supertopic are relevant as the U-10 class article can appear in such a supertopic whether it has its own topic or not. While it would make for nice visual structures, I don't see why this supertopic would need the U-10 class to appear as a subtopic at all. More than that, the subtopic link could actually point back to this topic - rst20xx (talk) 13:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so you are suggesting to remove the class article and add 10 & 11, then in the supertopic put the class article but link here for the subtopic? Or you want the class and the five other articles here? Nergaal (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think the second option would be better, and after all, 10 is the only one of the 6 articles that isn't a GA already - rst20xx (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What should happen to the image in that case, as some of the boats did not run under the German flag. Nergaal (talk) 20:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As the Germans made all the boats, I don't see a problem with still using this flag, or maybe the German national flag - rst20xx (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I've gotten SM U-11 to GA status and the GA for SM U-10 was a quick pass. All articles are at GA status now.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes to all, Nergal promoted SM U-10 and I promoted SM U-11. However credit goes to Bellhalla for the whole thing. But all articles are now at GA.--Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - so, uh, it seems most people would favour adding the articles (well, 2 out of 3). I've added them above and struck my oppose. I would support the 22-article layout above. Feedback from others would be appreciated - rst20xx (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, but should the U-10 class be a subtopic? —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 21:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, that's what all the discussion before your vote was about... rst20xx (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    ...and I continue to demonstrate my lack of reading skills. ;) Thanks Rst. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 16:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 17:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_and_good_topic_candidates/German_Type_UB_I_submarines/archive2&oldid=1138451121"