Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Final Fantasy Music/archive1

Final Fantasy Music edit

This is a good topic nomination, they are all good articles. They are all related to the same game series and are music.--What!?Why?Who? (talk) 04:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Music of the Final Fantasy series

13 articles

Discography of Final Fantasy I and II

Discography of Final Fantasy III

Discography of Final Fantasy IV

Discography of Final Fantasy V

Discography of Final Fantasy VI

Discography of Final Fantasy VII

Discography of Final Fantasy VIII

Discography of Final Fantasy IX

Discography of Final Fantasy X

Discography of Final Fantasy X-2

Discography of Final Fantasy XI

Discography of Final Fantasy XII

As I can see, you haven't made any significant contributions to any of these articles. Only nominate featured topic candidates if you have greatly contributed to the topic yourself. I consider this a Speedy withdrawal. -- _{signed by} SRE.K.A~~nnoyomous~~.L.24 _{(spell my name backwards) at} 06:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Being a significant contributor is not a requirement to nominate a topic. There is also no process for a speedy withdrawal. The nominator should attempt to notify major contributors. Though I will say that the topic seems to lack the likely lead article Music of the Final Fantasy series which is not a GA and so the topic probably fails anyway. Rreagan007 (talk) 16:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This. There's nothing wrong with nominating someone else's work; there's nothing in the criteria and contributors don't own articles. However, as said, the topic fails anyway. Fargo of Diarmuid (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as the guy who got every single article up there to GA except for FF8, I'm Opposing this nom. I mean, look at it- Music of Final Fantasy is B-class (and not close to GA, either), and you didn't even come up with a rational scope: you're including FFX-2, a spinoff/sequel of the main series, but not FFTactics (GA) or the other spinoff music articles that are in the template (mostly start-class). --Pres N 18:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily Withdrawn - Issues surrounding the appropriateness of nominating someone else's work aside, I would say that nominating a topic without a main article is grounds for a quick fail, per WP:COMMON and WP:IGNORE - rst20xx (talk) 19:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]