Hello, all. I've been working on this portal extensively throughout this last week or so, and I now believe it meets all the featured portal criteria. Rather than weekly/monthly updates to this portal, I've used the {{Random portal component}} so readers can see a selection of new content whenever is best for them, rather than having to wait for myself to update it. A directory of all subpages can be found here, should this be necessary. Qst16:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose from User:Feydey with multiple concerns. Almost all concerns now addressed. Added into drop-down box to prvent this page from becoming cluttered.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Oppose for now, suggest naming "Directory" back to the standard "Archive". Selected picture credits need fixing (credit goes to the creator, not the uploader). Archived News --> Archive. Selected quotes need punctuation. "Selected quote" archives? Expand "Spain topics" (see f.ex. Portal:France/Content topics). Fix "Associated Wikimedia" links. Add more DYK's (>10?). Add instructions how to add new SA's, SP's, DYK's, SB's. ITN needs sources and a copyedit. The portal's layout is good. Put the link/pages from here to the portal's talk page. I'd nominate the portal again later when it has more content and a peer review. feydey (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Renaming directory back to archives: . This is because this Portal only uses the {{Random portal component}}, so the articles listed in the directory are not archives, as they will be shown all the time when a user clicks the show new selections button, so intentionally made a directory, rather than archives. Qst17:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When the nomination was temporarily withdrawn pending a large selection of issues to be addressed.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Nomination temporarily withdrawn. The issues shouldn't take that long to fix up, so this will probably be back up and running shortly. Qst17:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All Featured portal nominees should display consistency, having 1 item in the news archive gives no indication how well this portal has been maintained and makes it harder to estimate how it will be maintained in the future. I still suggest withdrawal, going through peer review and then if it still looks FP-ish come back. Best, feydey (talk) 17:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am confused. Is this a 2nd part of the nomination or a new nomination (a resubmission)? If it's a resubmission, then please move the old discussion into archive. OhanaUnitedTalk page17:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Qst (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)