Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg

Aust blue dragonfly02 edit

 
A macro of an Australian Blue Dragonfly
Reason
Smaller than the minimum size requirements, image appears to be noisy and quality is not up to today's standards.
Previous nomination/s
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg
Nominator
Muhammad(talk)
  • DelistMuhammad(talk) 18:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist Very messy BG, and also too small... --Janke | Talk 10:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Can we suspend this for a month so that I can have a chance to upload a higher res file from the original? (I don't have the originals with me in Melbourne) --Fir0002 11:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Higher res won't change the messy bg... --Janke | Talk 13:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist per nom. Additionally, the background is very distracting. —αἰτίας discussion 01:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist per nom. Much better dragonfly images have been promoted in the last year. Cacophony (talk) 08:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Delist. The background is the big flaw; the size is not such a big deal since this was an early promotion, but the messiness makes this not what we would accept now composition-wise.--ragesoss (talk) 04:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist Regardless of size, the composition is subpar. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted MER-C 23:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]