Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Plumed Basilisk Portrait

Plumed Basilisk Portrait

Portrait of the plumed basilisk

Nominate and support. - cele4 19:14, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment People may also be interested in checking out commons:Image:Stirnlappenbasilisk3cele4.jpg by cele4. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 10:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It's not used on an article. Even if it was used on Plumed Basilisk, it would be largely redundant with Image:Plumedbasiliskcele4 edit.jpg, which is already an FP. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 11:01, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The other image Finlay mentioned also shows part of the thing on its back. The only way I'm going to support another Plumed Basilisk is if it's shown in its entirety, not just its head. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:44, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Question What do you think of the commons image I linked above? Still not enough of the lizard? ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - comment Now, portrait such an animal is find interesting I one sees the individual sheds as well as perfectly the eye range sowas not therefore surely sees one on a complete body picture an interesting admission (translated with babel fish)cele4 06:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment I am trying to find a better way for Cele4 to communicate with us... he only speaks German! Unfortunately it seems that Babelfish doesn't do a very good job. ~MDD 46 96 07:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Neutrality^talk 00:08, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
User:Kilo-Lima/Support I ~~like~~ love it. --Kilo-Lima 13:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not used in any article and we just had a niced FP for Plumed Basilisk, which shows more of the critter and which I like slightly more than this and the linked pic. (fuer cele4, es wurde gerade ein etwas besseres Bild eines Stirnlappen Basilisken gefeatured. Das vorgeschlagene Bild wird auch keinem Artikel auf en.wp.org verwendet, und das ist Voraussetzung fuer ein FPC!) --Dschwen 16:19, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, too dark, and not as good as the already featured pic -- Chris 73 | Talk 14:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The other picture is better. Cobra 09:10, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice image, but i like commons image mentioned above better --rogerd 03:07, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The current FP is nicer, and shows more of the animal. enochlau (talk) 15:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]